The committee’s discussion on the high school track project revolved around the need for expedited completion by fall 2025 and the financial implications of undertaking such an endeavor off the typical funding cycle. Members debated the appropriateness of using Community Preservation Act (CPA) funds for the project, with some questioning whether it aligned with the original intent of the CPA. The possibility of convening a special town meeting for project approval was considered. Disagreements were evident, with varying opinions on both the project’s organization and the adjustments made to the evolving plans, including reorientation for better drainage and fair soccer play.

In parallel, the committee engaged in a debate over the sustainability of the school budget, confronting a 6% increase from the previous year’s budget and whether this should serve as the base for the subsequent year’s increase. Concerns were raised about the use of temporary funding sources, such as operate Esser funds, and the long-term implications of such practices. The challenge was compounded by a 29% decline in school enrollment over the last 14 years. The acknowledgment of statewide problems with Chapter 70 by the lieutenant governor underscored the broader context of these local financial struggles.

Further complicating the committee’s financial oversight was the request for $14,300 to drill and test two new wells at the fire station, a critical response to a resurgence of gasoline contamination. The second request for an additional $8,000 to cover outstanding fuel bills highlighted the current strain on the town’s reserves, which would be reduced to $18,000 if approved. The discussion on this topic brought to light the concern over budget overruns and the need for proactive measures to mitigate fuel costs, which had risen due to increased staffing levels and, possibly, the idling of police vehicles.