One notable issue discussed at the meeting was the potential regulation of data centers, prompted by an inquiry from a company in Brooklyn, New York, about existing bylaws related to data centers, solar energy, and energy storage. Despite skepticism among some board members about the likelihood of a data center being developed in Shutesbury, the board took the inquiry seriously, considering a temporary halt to evaluate the implications of such developments. A motion was tabled to approve the moratorium, defining data centers as facilities composed of network computers and storage systems used to process large amounts of information. The proposal included adding data centers to the industrial section of the use table and prohibiting them in all four zones of the town.

The discussion on the moratorium was robust, with members weighing the economic benefits against the environmental concerns, particularly regarding water usage. One member expressed concern that a large corporation could establish a facility consuming significant water resources, potentially depleting local aquifers. The conversation also highlighted the need for a clear regulatory framework to prevent legal challenges and to ensure that the town’s resources and character are preserved.

The board debated the merits of the moratorium, with some members arguing that it could hinder potential economic growth by preventing developments that might positively impact the tax base. Others emphasized the importance of taking steps to regulate future developments.

The board acknowledged the need for a public hearing before any changes could be made to the bylaws, with a proposal to schedule the hearing for the same date as the next board meeting. Concerns were raised about deadlines for warrant articles, and the board discussed the logistical aspects of the upcoming public hearing, emphasizing the importance of keeping the process transparent and organized.

In addition to the discussion on data centers, the board addressed several other topics at the meeting. The board considered town development trends and communication strategies, with a proposal to utilize the town’s tax assessor’s Geographic Information System (GIS) to compile a table of available buildable lots. This would help differentiate between lots that already have houses and those that do not, providing better insights into development potential.

A conversation about communication strategies highlighted the importance of informing the community about the board’s activities and initiatives. Plans for an upcoming communication to the community were outlined, emphasizing the need to recount past achievements and inform residents about ongoing discussions. The board recognized the necessity of managing public expectations and ensuring transparency about ongoing deliberations.

The meeting also addressed ongoing litigation affecting the town, with an acknowledgment of an upcoming court date set for November 4th. While details of the litigation were not disclosed due to its ongoing nature, the board emphasized the importance of keeping the community informed about the situation.

Procedural matters were also discussed, including the approval of minutes from previous meetings and the need to keep up with documentation to maintain an accurate record of the board’s activities. The board considered delegating the task of summarizing open session items for executive session meetings to ensure proper documentation.