The board examined proposed changes to zoning bylaws in response to the Massachusetts Affordable Homes Act, emphasizing the need for compliance with state mandates. The draft document categorizing mandatory and suggested modifications sparked a discussion, particularly surrounding accessory dwelling units (ADUs). Present bylaws allow one ADU per one-acre lot, but new regulations may permit more, contingent on special permits. This potential shift raised concerns about maintaining the town’s character and managing increased population density.

A significant portion of the discussion focused on ADUs, with the Massachusetts law prohibiting owner occupancy requirements and limiting parking to one space. This raised questions about the consistency of existing local bylaws, which currently prohibit mobile homes but might be amended to allow them on permanent foundations as ADUs. The debate expanded to consider whether ADUs could be integrated into two-family dwellings, offering more flexible housing options.

The board also discussed the possible expansion of ADUs on single properties, considering the implications for community density and character. Some participants suggested clustering ADUs similar to open space designs, while others highlighted potential impacts on infrastructure and town character. The conversation acknowledged the need for further public input and extended deliberations, with plans to revisit the topic in future meetings.

A proposal to standardize rental durations across different housing types aimed to prevent short-term rentals like Airbnbs from disrupting the town’s housing market. Suggestions included implementing a recording system for rental agreements to ensure compliance with intended affordable housing goals.

Financial resources were also a topic of interest, with references to Community Preservation Act (CPA) funds available for housing projects. Although a portion of these funds is earmarked for specific projects, opportunities for grants to support zoning adjustments were noted as potential avenues to enhance affordable housing in Shutesbury.

Another topic was the classification and regulation of tiny houses. The board considered whether tiny houses could qualify as ADUs or primary residences, exploring the implications of these classifications on local zoning laws. The discussion acknowledged the need for further research on their environmental impact, particularly concerning septic systems and water usage.

Amidst these zoning discussions, the board also reviewed a site visit report for the Wheelock solar facility. Safety concerns were raised about brush clearance near lithium-ion battery pads, with suggestions to increase the distance of non-combustible materials to mitigate fire risks. The board debated its authority to request such changes but agreed on the importance of balancing safety with regulatory compliance.