Solar Installation Proposal Faces Zoning Challenges at Southwick Planning Meeting

The Southwick Planning Board meeting on February 4, 2025, addressed several topics, including a solar installation proposal by Loadstar Energy and ongoing discussions on accessory dwelling units (ADUs). Key highlights from the meeting included zoning complications for solar energy, permit issues for building on Sheep Pasture Road, and continued deliberations on ADU bylaws.

0:00A central topic of the meeting was the proposed solar installation by Loadstar Energy on a parcel purchased by Graes Tea House on Granville Road. This proposal encountered zoning challenges due to the landlocked nature of several parcels and the absence of a definitive road plan. The planning board discussed the implications of zoning regulations, noting that without specific language in the solar bylaw addressing such situations, development might require the creation of a subdivision roadway to provide necessary frontage. The planner highlighted the complexities surrounding a right-of-way intended for access, which had evolved over many years. Board members expressed concerns about these regulatory hurdles and the need for clarity in the solar bylaw to facilitate future projects.

In another noteworthy discussion, the board examined issues regarding the property on Sheep Pasture Road, where the landowner, Paavo Zuu, intends to construct a single-family home. The planner noted that while reviewing the building permit applications, the septic design was flagged as potentially exceeding one acre of land disturbance. This prompted further investigation into the clearing activities on-site. A letter was sent to the landowner, informing him of the proximity to the threshold and emphasizing that any additional clearing would require a stormwater permit. The board stressed the importance of adhering to regulatory thresholds and ensuring proper permitting processes are followed.

The planning board also continued its discussions on the proposed Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) bylaw. Minor changes to the draft bylaw were reviewed, particularly regarding the Wellhead Protection District. The planner suggested removing specific references to this district to streamline the language. The regulations regarding setbacks for ADUs generated considerable discussion, highlighting that the least restrictive setback requirements would apply, whether the unit is attached or detached. This raised concerns about existing properties that may not comply with these regulations, prompting further deliberation. A public hearing on the ADU bylaw was scheduled to continue on February 25, 2025.

20:19The meeting also addressed dock configurations, specifically regarding transient slips on Kine Road. The board recognized that they had previously permitted 20 transient slips, but only 16 had been utilized in recent seasons. There was a proposal to reduce the number of slips to 12, considering existing site constraints and parking occupancy. The board emphasized the importance of safety and traffic flow for boating in the area, acknowledging past agreements with the Lake Management Committee (LMC) that avoided congestion and promoted safe navigation.

38:31Further discussions included the reevaluation of subdivision infrastructure security at Noble Ste Crossings. Future updates were anticipated once weather conditions improved, and the need for a permit from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection was stressed.

In addition, the board reviewed development plans for Lots 14 and 19 at the Greens of Southwick East subdivision, focusing on elements such as septic features and stormwater management. Lot 19 remained under a bond, while Lot 14 did not. A provisional positive recommendation for both lots was suggested to advance the building permit process.

The meeting also covered an Approval Not Required (ANR) plan for six South Lumis Street, with VE Associates submitting a plan that mirrored a previously granted special permit. The endorsement of this plan was deemed necessary to acknowledge the frontage lot and estate lots established by the special permit, leading to its approval.

Note: This meeting summary was generated by AI, which can occasionally misspell names, misattribute actions, and state inaccuracies. This summary is intended to be a starting point and you should review the meeting record linked above before acting on anything you read. If we got something wrong, let us know. We’re working every day to improve our process in pursuit of universal local government transparency.

Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly: