The most discussion centered around the redevelopment project involving several properties along Main Street. Initially approved in 1989, the project faced numerous delays due to environmental cleanup challenges and funding issues. After years of stagnation, recent developments have reignited efforts, with the project now including the elevation of structures above the flood hazard area, targeting an elevation of 49 feet to mitigate flood risks. This project aims to consolidate properties, potentially vacate Meadow Street, and create a single parcel for development. The current plan includes retail space on the ground floor and four floors of residential units above, with a two-level parking structure providing 131 spaces.

Concerns about flood management dominated the meeting. One board member expressed skepticism regarding the accuracy of the flood elevation mapping, citing that past events like Hurricane Ida saw floodwaters exceed the reported elevation of 49 feet. They referenced reports from Hamilton Street residents who experienced higher flood levels, underlining the need for more precise flood hazard assessments. The developer’s proposal to enhance flood storage by removing existing buildings was discussed, but doubts remained about whether modifications would genuinely address persistent flooding issues.

The conversation also focused on the project’s design and its implications for water flow during storms. The approach of allowing water to flow in and out of the site, rather than attempting to retain it, was clarified. However, concerns were raised about a driveway that could potentially flood, posing risks to vehicles trying to exit during heavy rain. The unpredictability of flood levels during extreme weather events was highlighted, with historical flooding events suggesting the need for robust emergency access and safety measures.

Environmental issues were another point of discussion. The project involves significant excavation, particularly on the western side, which is expected to drop several feet in elevation. The cleanup strategy includes capping a landfill with a 12-inch clay layer to address contamination. Discussions with the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) are ongoing to determine the most effective remediation strategy. The location of the generator was also scrutinized, as it is potentially at risk of flooding during heavy rain, necessitating further investigation into its placement.

The topic of affordable housing was brought up, with the project aiming to provide workforce housing affordable to individuals earning between 80% and 120% of the region’s median income. This approach offers flexibility in targeting local residents compared to state mandates for affordable housing. Participants emphasized the importance of collaborating with local authorities to meet housing needs, should the project move forward.

A long-term resident stressed the importance of ensuring the project’s success, noting the area’s lack of development historically. The need for the borough to take a leadership role in fostering public-private partnerships to enhance the area was underscored.

Concerns about the project’s visual impact and integration with the community were also raised. The aesthetic consistency between Veterans Memorial Drive and Main Street was discussed, with suggestions to ensure the visual appeal is uniform on both sides of the building. The bio-retention basin planned between the building and neighboring properties on Hamilton Street was mentioned, designed to include shrubbery and trees. The project’s overall design aims to improve the streetscape and visual appeal of the area, addressing existing blight and contamination issues.