The issue of the fence ordinance captured the board’s attention as it grappled with finding a balance between the town’s regulations and the specific circumstances of residents. A resident’s appeal against the denial of a 5-foot fence installation highlighted the challenges faced by homeowners, particularly for those with corner lots where privacy is a concern. The denial was grounded in the ordinance’s demand for transparency and the location of the fence within the sight triangle, a standard aimed at maintaining visibility for safety and aesthetic reasons.

During the meeting, board members engaged in a debate on how to effectively modify the ordinance without compromising its intent. Some suggested that the Architectural Review Board could add a layer of review for corner lots, potentially offering tailored solutions to these unique properties. However, this proposal was met with concerns about introducing more complexity into the approval process, potentially creating delays for residents.

The discussion also entertained the idea of redefining the definitions of front, side, and backyards within the ordinance to better accommodate the needs of corner lot properties. Opinions varied on this approach’s effectiveness, with board members weighing the practical implications of such changes. The conversation underscored the importance of the ordinance’s goals while recognizing the need to adapt to the diverse situations faced by residents.

In addition to the fence ordinance, the meeting briefly touched upon other residential concerns. The packet for the meeting included various ordinances associated with fencing, which some members questioned the necessity of. Public commentary brought up the issue of tree replacement in front of new buildings, voicing apprehension over the size and suitability of the trees. This was quickly addressed by a board member who clarified that this concern was administrative in nature and not within the board’s jurisdiction.

The legality of certain actions related to environmental concerns was also debated, with emphasis on adhering to approved site plans and the correct management of administrative tasks.

The meeting concluded with a brief update on a resolution concerning the front facade of a facility. The resolution had been previously heard, and it was noted that efforts were underway to integrate the approvals of both the planning board and the architectural review board.