Central to the discussions was the consideration of modifying setback requirements and height restrictions for fences on residential properties, particularly corner lots. The board examined various options, including the possibility of reducing the setback for fences and permitting increased height the further the fence is from the property line. This approach aimed to address concerns about privacy and aesthetics while also considering safety and visibility at street corners. The concept of conditional use was introduced.

Members debated the practicality of forming a committee to handle the review of non-standard fence height requests. One option was to utilize the existing Architectural Review Board (ARB), though concerns were raised regarding their understanding of residential property nuances. The board also recognized the potential for a large volume of applications, questioning the associated costs and the ability to manage increased demand efficiently.

Furthermore, the board highlighted the importance of a transparent application process for property owners seeking approval for non-standard fence heights. Emphasizing customer service and accessibility, the board aspired to establish clear standards that would both simplify the process for residents and ensure practical considerations are factored into the regulations. The discussion extended to the establishment of a fee structure for the application and appeal process, with the board expressing caution against increasing fees without proper authorization.

The board also contemplated the implications of different lot sizes and proportions for corner lots, acknowledging the challenge in creating a one-size-fits-all standard. The varying characteristics of each property necessitated a flexible approach that could accommodate unique circumstances while still maintaining a cohesive aesthetic within the community.

In addition to privacy and aesthetic considerations, safety remained a paramount concern, leading to a discussion about sight triangle regulations. Adjustments to these regulations could influence the permissible height of fences and the required setbacks to ensure that visibility at intersections is not compromised.

The topic of an appeal mechanism for non-standard fence height decisions was also broached, with the idea of having an appeal process to the planning board itself. This would provide an additional layer of review for property owners dissatisfied with initial decisions.

The emphasis was consistently on creating a framework that balanced the diverse needs of the community – respecting individual preferences and property characteristics while upholding the collective interests of safety and neighborhood aesthetics.