The community’s unease extends beyond specific buildings to the broader planning process, with calls for more public involvement and transparency. Residents expressed a need for an advisory committee that would allow them to provide input on various community issues, including drugs, alcohol, and firearms. The Planning Board recognized the importance of public participation and confirmed that upcoming planning sessions would include public meetings with professionals hired to address the town’s planning and development concerns.

During the meeting, questions were also raised regarding how existing structures and businesses would be affected by new master plans and zoning regulations. The board clarified that current structures and pre-existing non-conforming businesses are “grandfathered in,” meaning they are not required to conform to new standards or reapply for permits, even with changes in zoning. This protection underscores the board’s emphasis on understanding the distinct roles of the borough council, the planning board, and the zoning board, which are all governed by state law. The board encouraged residents to become familiar with these relationships and the statutory regulations that guide them.

The Planning Board’s responses aimed to provide guidance and reassurance about the structured approach to planning and development, which includes adherence to state laws and a commitment to thoroughness and transparency. The resident’s concerns about staying informed and the process for submitting input led to the board’s assurance that all emails sent to the Planning Board become part of the official record and are disseminated to the entire board for consideration.