One of the most discussed topics was the proposal to create 13 apartments at a property at 25-27 North Midall, which necessitated a use variance due to the property’s R2 zoning. Concerns about parking, flood mitigation, and the proximity to a federal toxic cleanup site were addressed by the project’s engineer and professional planner. They assured that the building was not in a flood zone and that the revised plan included 26 parking spaces, meeting the requirement of 28 spaces with EV charging provisions.

The board also deliberated on a plan revision to convert an office building into two one-bedroom apartments, which raised concerns about EV charging compliance and accessible parking spaces. Additionally, the removal of a utility pole and the placement of EV chargers were debated, along with the property’s flood zone location.

Public concerns were vocalized regarding the potential for flooding and parking issues at the proposed apartment building, with particular attention given to the underpass’s propensity to flood during heavy rainstorms. Despite these worries, the positive criteria of the project were emphasized, with the applicant arguing that the improvements aligned with the borough’s master plan goals, including the promotion of general welfare and efficient land use.

The meeting also addressed the renovation of a building on Grove Street, where the applicant intended to convert office space into residential units. The board reviewed the proposal’s compliance with zoning regulations and ultimately approved the application with conditions, including that the basement space of one unit would not be used for residential purposes.

Concerns about parking were a recurrent theme, especially related to the proposed apartments in neighborhoods with narrow streets and limited parking spaces. Residents expressed worries about increased residential units impacting parking availability and traffic congestion. The board considered granting variances for parking arrangements.

Furthermore, a proposal for the improvement of a property’s parking lot to include EV charging stations was discussed, with the applicant citing the project’s consistency with the borough’s master plan. The board approved the application, recognizing the need for a diverse housing stock and redevelopment in selected locations.

During the meeting, concerns were also raised about a gun store’s opening, with a resident questioning the clarity and accessibility of the appeal process to the zoning board. The board clarified the legal procedures for appeals and the time frame for aggrieved parties to contest a permit issuance.

The debate over a proposed development project was particularly contested, with skepticism about the adequacy of parking solutions in the face of increased residential density. After a recess and further discussion, the developer amended the application to remove two basement apartments from the main building, addressing concerns about parking and flooding while retaining the overall apartment mix.