The application for zoning relief submitted by Princeton Canal LLC, represented by attorney Mike O’Rnik, focused on the conversion of the century-old professional office building into residential apartments. The board scrutinized the necessity of various variances, such as a D1 use variance to permit multifamily residential use in a zone originally designated for professional office purposes. The application also required an FR variance for the floor area ratio, as the proposed 36.84% exceeded the permitted 25%. Additionally, C bulk variances were sought for side yard setbacks and improvement coverage, with proposed adjustments falling short of current zoning regulations.

During the meeting, the board heard testimony from architect Ashraf Ragab, who detailed the planned renovations, including the integration of ADA-compliant features such as a wheelchair lift and the conversion of half baths into full ADA-compliant bathrooms. Ragab emphasized the inclusion of accessible units on the first floor, accommodating residents with disabilities. The proposed site plans also highlighted parking enhancements, increasing capacity from 12 to 15 spaces, with provisions for electric vehicle-ready and ADA-compliant spaces.

A debate emerged over the use of a wheelchair lift versus ramps to satisfy accessibility codes. One board member argued that ramps were necessary under the International Building Code (IBC) due to the building’s change in classification from a B (business) to an R (residential) use, while others cited the ICC 117 code allowing for lifts in existing structures with limited space. The board deliberated on the feasibility of constructing a ramp along the building’s western side, given the site’s constraints, with the consensus that further analysis was needed to determine the optimal solution.

The board also addressed the important topic of stormwater management and drainage for the expanded parking area, considering the potential need for additional trench drains to ensure proper water runoff. Additionally, they examined lighting plans. The proposed lighting fixtures, at 10 feet tall, were to be adjusted to meet these requirements.

Concerns about increased traffic due to the building’s conversion were raised by resident David Lang, who questioned the potential for augmented traffic flow in the predominantly residential area, particularly on Cam Place. A traffic engineer testified that the change from office to residential use would likely result in a reduction of traffic during peak hours compared to what a medical office might generate. The expert noted that the residential use would lead to a more evenly distributed traffic pattern throughout the day, contrary to the concentrated peaks associated with office operations.

The board also delved into the project’s implications for air quality, especially in the basement apartments, with assurances that the design incorporated high-efficiency HVAC systems to maintain compliance with air quality standards. However, specific details about window designs and their impact on ventilation remained under discussion.

The meeting further addressed the logistics of trash and recycling management, with plans to employ a private hauler due to the county’s trash truck being unable to service the site. The architect proposed specific locations for dumpsters to ensure efficient waste management, while also committing to additional landscaping to enhance the property’s aesthetic appeal and provide adequate screening.

As the meeting drew to a close, the board acknowledged the need for further documentation and revisions to the application before a final decision could be made. Discussions included potential conditions related to noise compliance for HVAC systems and backup generators, as well as the necessity for backup power to ensure the operation of accessibility features during outages.