A prominent topic during the meeting was the detailed renovation plan for a property on South Bridge Street, presented by architect Roberto Hernandez and the applicant, Keith Parsy. They sought approval for a project that aims to transform the property from a “rundown old cape” into a modernized residence suitable for their retirement. Central to the renovation is a full-height addition replacing the existing second floor, which will add two bedrooms, including a master suite with a walk-in closet, and two bathrooms. The first floor is set to undergo a comprehensive gut renovation, introducing new electrical, plumbing, and HVAC systems. Hernandez outlined plans for a small foyer addition to improve the entrance and detailed the removal of a load-bearing wall to create an open concept between the kitchen and living room.

The visual appeal of the home is set to be enhanced by a covered concrete porch, featuring a gable frame and new railings. Hernandez proposed using white hardy plank siding with black windows to accentuate the colonial style, while the sides would feature white vinyl siding. The roof shingles are planned to be charcoal black, providing a stark contrast to the siding. A-frame dormers are also part of the design. Discussions on window grills and the potential for underground electrical service relocation were noted, with cost being a consideration.

The renovation plan includes requests for two variances to address existing nonconformities in the side and front yard setbacks. The current side yard setback is 5.7 feet, less than the required 8 feet, while the front yard setback is proposed at 19.25 feet, short of the 25-foot requirement. Hernandez argued that the proposed changes would not exacerbate these nonconformities and highlighted the neighborhood enhancement as a benefit.

Board members raised questions regarding the side yard setback issues and potential property acquisition to resolve them. Hernandez confirmed that acquiring additional property was not feasible, emphasizing the hardship due to the existing lot’s constraints. The architect assured that stormwater management would direct water away from neighboring properties, and the existing wooden fence along the property line would be repaired as part of the renovation.

The public session concluded with board members expressing satisfaction with the presentation’s thoroughness and the proposed improvements. A motion to approve the application was made, contingent upon incorporating the recommendations from Mr. Cole’s report, to which board members offered no objections.

Additionally, the meeting encountered procedural challenges concerning quorum when discussing the land use application for a property on South Bridge Street. Some members excused themselves due to proximity to the site, leading to the necessity of rescheduling the application. The board also noted the upcoming hearing for a property on East Main Street, complicated by the applicant’s vacation plans, affecting scheduling.