The primary focus of the meeting was a review of the proposed group home for individuals with developmental disabilities on West High Street. The attorney representing the applicant detailed that the project would convert a commercial building into a single-family dwelling, requiring a D4 F variance due to the layout of the property, although no physical changes to the structure were proposed. The attorney emphasized that the project aimed to reduce impervious coverage from 70% to 63%, despite still exceeding the permissible limit for the zone.

The proposed group home would feature four bedrooms, a kitchen, and a dining room, with additional spaces for group activities. The representatives assured that the attic would be used as a recreational area rather than a kitchen and that the basement would be for storage and recreation only. The home aims to foster independence and life skills among residents through various activities and training.

A point of discussion was the nature of the group home. They detailed a typical day for residents, including attendance at day programs and various activities such as music classes and walks. Visitors are allowed, varying from weekly to infrequent visits based on family involvement.

The representatives also addressed concerns about the residents’ autonomy, explaining that supervision would depend on individual care plans. Staff typically drive residents to activities, though some may walk if approved. The home is subject to regulations and inspections to ensure compliance with the Division of Developmental Disabilities (DDD) standards.

The board then moved to the engineering and architectural aspects of the project. The existing structure, a two-and-a-half-story building, would see minimal exterior changes, such as the removal of two windows. The proposal included transforming the rear area from complete pavement to a fenced-in patio and lawn area, which would decrease impervious coverage and enhance stormwater management. The applicant agreed to plant three street trees and address sidewalk hazards.

Further discussions included the necessity of a full sprinkler system as required by New Jersey’s construction code for residential care facilities. The board emphasized the importance of meeting all fire safety regulations before approval. Concerns about the building’s three electrical meters were raised, with an intention to consolidate them where possible.

The meeting also covered the need for multiple variances due to existing property conditions. The current floor area ratio (FAR) of 68.3% far exceeds the permitted 25%, necessitating various bulk variances. The representatives argued that the proposed use aligns with the town’s master plan, promoting diverse housing types and business activity in the central business district. The board discussed the safety and practicality of the proposed parking layout, which involves four stalls backing out onto Maple Street. Despite some concerns, it was assessed as reasonable given the area’s light traffic flow.

In addition to the group home proposal, the board addressed other zoning matters. A member raised concerns about the presence of farm animals in residential neighborhoods, suggesting a review of current zoning ordinances to potentially ban chickens, pigs, and ducks. The board also noted the resignation of a long-serving planning board member, De Rinsky, and expressed appreciation for her contributions, especially her advocacy for smaller housing models.

A proposal regarding the property on West Cliff Street was introduced, involving modifications that would result in the loss of two parking spaces due to a driveway relocation. This ordinance was set for discussion at the next council meeting.

The board reviewed an application for a property on Mercer Street, concerning a new house adjacent to a previously approved project. The applicant presented final steps for moving forward, including a motion to amend the original resolution concerning the variance for the property.

Finally, the board discussed an application for a property on Fifth Street, previously approved for use by landscapers. Compliance with DEP conditions was emphasized due to the site’s flood hazard zone, necessitating secure anchoring of structures.