South Washington County School Board Tackles Indigenous Education, Inclusivity in Schools, and Policy Reviews

In a meeting held on February 20, 2025, the South Washington County School Board engaged in discussions on several topics, including initiatives to support indigenous students, the presence of politically charged content in schools, and the review of district policies.

0:28The most prominent topic of the meeting was the extensive focus on indigenous education programs within the district. Assistant Superintendent Kelly Jansen provided an annual update on indigenous education, highlighting the district’s compliance with the Minnesota American Indian education aid program, which requires a minimum of 20 self-identified indigenous students. The district currently serves 386 indigenous students, making up approximately 2% of its total student population. NAPAC had recently expressed satisfaction with how the district allocated resources for indigenous education.

Stephanie Schroer further detailed the district’s efforts to support indigenous students, focusing on postsecondary preparation and academic achievement. Initiatives to increase the number of indigenous students taking the ACT included offering a virtual test prep course. Schroer reported that indigenous students in the district had higher graduation rates than the state average. Efforts to improve literacy featured a tutoring program with indigenous-authored books for elementary students and a book club for middle schoolers to reinterpret traditional oral stories. Curriculum development aimed to integrate American Indian cultural heritage into educational standards, and indigenous-authored books were provided to students during breaks.

28:01The board also discussed the use of cultural trunks, tools designed to enhance lessons on indigenous history and traditions across schools. Events such as celebrations and storytelling nights are planned to foster community among indigenous families, addressing the previously noted lack of gathering spaces. The meeting addressed the expansion of cultural liaisons, now staffed by multiple individuals, to better connect with families and develop intercultural awareness among all students. Professional development for teachers included an indigenous book club to enhance understanding. A presentation at Woodbury Elementary highlighted cultural differences through activities involving Ojibwe and Dakota floral beadwork.

45:18Another topic was the ongoing debate over politically charged content within school environments. Concerns were raised about divisive speech, specifically the displays of “Black Lives Matter” and “White Lives Matter” posters. Participants discussed whether such materials contribute to an inclusive environment or risk alienating students of different racial or ethnic backgrounds. Some argued for the necessity of these displays as expressions for historically marginalized groups, while others cautioned against exclusionary impacts.

28:01A board member expressed concerns about certain phrases displayed in schools that could potentially alienate students who do not identify with specific racial groups. This raised questions about whether these displays align with the district’s policies on racial harassment, which emphasize creating an inclusive academic environment for all.

In terms of policy actions, the board reviewed proposed changes to eight policies, including those related to family and medical leave, harassment, and student discipline. A resolution was passed to appoint Louise Hines as a new school board member to fill a vacancy until the next general election.

45:18Superintendent Julie Nielsen concluded the meeting with updates on recent district events. She celebrated the East Ridge High School symphonic band’s performance at a national music conference and shared a lighthearted story from a kindergarten classroom during “I Love to Read Month.” Nielsen also addressed school closures due to extreme weather, explaining the decision-making process prioritizing student safety.

Note: This meeting summary was generated by AI, which can occasionally misspell names, misattribute actions, and state inaccuracies. This summary is intended to be a starting point and you should review the meeting record linked above before acting on anything you read. If we got something wrong, let us know. We’re working every day to improve our process in pursuit of universal local government transparency.

Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly:

Trending meetings
across the country: