The most noteworthy event of the meeting was the unanimous approval of waivers for a residential solar array project proposed by Chris Bowen on Coleman Road. This project includes a 10.3 kilowatt ground-mounted solar system designed to supplement an existing roof-mounted array, catering to increased electricity consumption due to mini-splits and electric vehicles. John Ward, representing Greenfield Solar, presented the project, emphasizing its compliance with aesthetic and privacy concerns by ensuring that the array would not be visible from the road or nearby properties.

The deliberation over the solar array was underscored by recent changes in the town’s bylaws that now eliminate the need for site plan reviews for ground-mounted residential solar arrays. Previously, Southampton was among the few towns requiring such reviews. The board discussed and ultimately granted waivers from notifying abutters within 300 feet and certain site plan review requirements, citing the inadequacy of existing bylaws that were traditionally geared towards larger developments.

The board’s decision to approve the waivers was influenced by a history of leniency in similar cases, especially given the recent bylaw amendment. The discussion also touched on compliance with site setbacks, with John Ward assuring the board that property pins had been verified, and the building inspector would confirm these upon application for a building permit. With no further objections, the motion to accept the site plan review and grant the waivers was seconded and passed unanimously.

Following the solar array discussion, the board turned its attention to two ANR applications. The proposal for a property on Maple Street, represented by Bridget Likely for the Castro Land Trust, involved subdividing a parcel to place a conservation restriction on about 69 acres, leaving a portion available for potential future development. The board found the proposal straightforward, endorsing it with minimal discussion.

Conversely, the ANR application for a property on Glendale Road, part of a winery operation, prompted more dialogue due to a septic system’s leach field crossing a proposed property line, potentially violating Title 5 regulations. Board members debated the need for a variance from the Board of Health, ultimately endorsing the plan on the condition that the applicant secures the necessary documentation regarding the leach field encroachment.

The meeting also addressed procedural issues surrounding a parcel of land on County Road intended for withdrawal from Chapter 61A, a process required for a family member to build a house. The assessors awaited planning board approval before forwarding the matter to the select board. The motion was seconded and unanimously approved, allowing the process to proceed to the Conservation Commission and select board.

Additionally, the board endorsed a previously approved building permit for a house on County Road, following a motion that was unanimously supported. Committee reports revealed plans to hire a junior planner to assist multiple committees, addressing budget constraints while aiming to alleviate administrative burdens on the chair. The board acknowledged the importance of precision in zoning matters, referencing past challenges with legal notices and public postings.