The meeting commenced with a focus on the request from the estate of Janette Judge to withdraw 3.11 acres from a larger parcel previously enrolled in Chapter 61, which concerns the taxation of land for conservation and agricultural purposes. The property in question, represented by Robert Hyde, was earmarked for development into a building lot with access from Middle Road. Board members engaged in a discussion about the implications of this withdrawal on the remaining land, particularly concerning its future development potential and any prior consideration for open space or conservation.

A disagreement arose among the board members regarding the necessity of referring the matter to the Housing Authority. This led to a heated exchange, with one member accusing another of obstructing the flow of information necessary for informed decision-making. A motion was introduced to accept the chapter withdrawal application and waive the town’s right of first refusal, while a substitute motion proposed that the matter be referred to the Housing Authority for further review.

Members debated the procedural aspects of both motions, questioning the planning board’s authority to refer issues to other town boards and the statutory obligations that might entail. The chairperson emphasized the responsibility of the planning board to provide clear and accurate information to the public, expressing frustration over the perceived lack of clarity in the discussions. Despite the procedural debates, the board conducted a vote on the motion to waive the right of first refusal, recognizing that the matter would still be forwarded to the select board and other agencies for their input.

The session also included a discussion on a solar project proposed by Mark Manino for his property on Yard Road. Although the solar company was not present, a letter was submitted requesting waivers for a ground-mounted solar unit classified under the intermediate category. Mr. Manino provided an overview, emphasizing his intention to minimize the project’s environmental impact. He assured the board that the solar array would not be visible from the road and would involve no changes to the site’s existing conditions.

The board expressed general support for Mr. Manino’s proposal, noting the thoroughness of the application and the clarity of the exemptions requested. A motion to approve the application with the requested waivers was made and passed unanimously, with board members commending Mr. Manino for his presentation.

Another solar permit application was presented by Leah Visconti from Insight Ventures for a project on Pleasant Street. This application, modified to fit the small-scale category, was also approved unanimously after addressing concerns about tree removal, which Leah clarified was unrelated to the solar array project. The board acknowledged the ongoing collaboration with the Conservation Commission, confirming that their separate application process was in motion.

The meeting also touched on other procedural and informational matters, including a chapter withdrawal currently on hold due to incomplete paperwork and a landowner exploring conservation options with the town. Future planning initiatives were discussed, highlighting the need for a dedicated town planner to manage land use and development, especially concerning a 54-acre site at 117 to 125 College Highway. The importance of public engagement and modernizing planning efforts was underscored by various participants.