Southwick Board Faces Scrutiny Over Proposed Municipal Internet and Financial Decisions

The Southwick Select Board meeting on March 31, 2025, tackled a range of issues, with the proposed municipal internet service drawing particular scrutiny from residents. Concerns were raised about the project’s potential financial implications for taxpayers, alongside deliberations on reserve fund transfers and the need for thorough financial oversight.

01:06The most pressing subject during the meeting was the proposed municipal internet service. Resident Kimberly Lamar from Granville Road spoke during public comments, voicing concerns about the initiative. She described her apprehension about potential rate increases and the governing role of Whip City. Lamar emphasized the critical importance of achieving a projected take rate of 50-55% for financial viability, warning that failing to meet these numbers could result in tax increases for residents. She highlighted the lack of transparency in the initial online questionnaire provided by the town, criticizing it as ambiguous and potentially misleading.

Lamar’s comments also touched on the financial model’s reliance on subsidizing businesses that would benefit from the service, a point she strongly opposed. She underscored that many residents might not need or afford higher internet speeds at the proposed costs, referencing West Springfield’s similar service, which only attracted 300 subscribers. Her remarks concluded with a call for greater transparency in the financial obligations residents might face during the build-out phase of the infrastructure.

01:08:19Following Lamar’s comments, the discussion shifted to a related topic: the ongoing assessment of Make Ready costs for the internet project. A board member noted the divided opinions within the community, stressing the importance of resident participation in meetings to ensure their voices are heard. There was a motion to have the select board request the Chief Administrative Officer collaborate with legal counsel on drafting necessary bonding articles for an upcoming town meeting to advance the project.

35:27The meeting then addressed the intricacies of financial management, notably reserve fund transfers and departmental budget constraints. A reserve fund transfer for a DPW copier, which exceeded the typical budgetary threshold, was approved unanimously. Another financial matter was a proposed reserve fund transfer of $115,000 for the fire station’s sleep awake alarm, which also passed after deliberation.

42:59The board also discussed the potential adjustment of compensation for the chair position. While some members acknowledged the increased workload and responsibilities of the role, there was a consensus that financial incentives should not drive people to run for select board positions. This sparked a debate about maintaining traditional role rotations within the board and adhering to previous agreements.

56:02Attention was drawn to the administration and enforcement of the Wetlands Protection Act, focusing on fund management for technical assistance and project review expenses. It was highlighted that some funds had been misallocated to the general fund over the past five years, totaling approximately $21,000. This prompted a motion to authorize the management of these funds for a year, with a follow-up report due at the next budget hearing.

01:02:51Additionally, a proposed public policy regarding veterans’ leave was brought up. Pending town counsel review, the policy aimed to align with state law regarding leave days for veterans, stressing the need for clarity and appropriateness in the town’s current policy.

50:46The board also revisited sewer regulations concerning grinder pumps, debating the implications of shifting responsibility back to homeowners. Concerns were raised about the potential legal challenges of retroactive regulation changes, with suggestions to postpone the decision for further review and alternative language considerations.

01:12:10The meeting concluded with administrative tasks, including acknowledging a payroll warrant and reviewing minutes. A 3% increase in non-union pay rates was agreed upon for the upcoming fiscal year. The board planned to enter an executive session to discuss collective bargaining and litigation matters, following Massachusetts General Law provisions.

Note: This meeting summary was generated by AI, which can occasionally misspell names, misattribute actions, and state inaccuracies. This summary is intended to be a starting point and you should review the meeting record linked above before acting on anything you read. If we got something wrong, let us know. We’re working every day to improve our process in pursuit of universal local government transparency.

Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly:

Trending meetings
across the country: