The most pressing topic discussed was the situation on Foster Road, where a tree had fallen during a storm, and additional trees had been removed without prior approval. The new owner, identified as Alex, presented photographic evidence showing several stumps from trees that were marked for removal. The commission expressed concerns about a previously noted violation involving a sign affixed to a tree, deemed inappropriate. Alex also mentioned he had found trash in the wetland area and had begun removing it. However, he was informed that he needed commission approval to continue this cleanup.

The commission emphasized the need for a structured plan for cleaning the wetland. It was stated that “there needs to be a plan to say how it’s going to be done,” highlighting that only non-organic materials could be removed. Alex was advised to return with a proposal outlining his methods for trash removal and possible plantings to restore the area. An enforcement order detailing the required plantings was mentioned, with one member offering to assist Alex in this process.

Another issue involved the dock and vessel obstructions on Holiday Drive, impacting access to the Chestnut Inlet. The commission sought clarification on the water rights associated with the docks and the ownership of the area. Previous attempts to communicate with the property owner had been unsuccessful, with a letter sent to them bouncing back. The commission discussed the importance of understanding the deed to ascertain the rights to the waterway and noted that the owner had provided part of their deed but not the complete document. Members emphasized the necessity of obtaining a full deed to clarify the rights and responsibilities related to the docks and the inlet.

The commission also tackled a complicated case involving tree removals at Granville Gorge. Evidence suggested intentional damage, with photographs revealing trees that had been chopped down.

The meeting addressed the ongoing project on Foster Road, where a Notice of Intent (NOI) involved building a single-family home within the riverfront and buffer zone. The commission had previously requested a review from Mark Stinson of the Department of Environmental Protection, who confirmed the application’s acceptability. However, the applicant expressed the need for a peer review, with Jeff Smith from Svenia Associates showing interest in conducting it. The commission agreed to continue the matter, with a motion made, seconded, and unanimously approved.

In new business, the commission reviewed a proposal related to 24 and Nicholson Hill Road, where Lis Berelli sought to delineate wetlands on a parcel of land. The new plan proposed less impact due to the repositioning of the house further from the isolated wetland. The commission discussed complications from a previous project involving silt fencing issues due to miscommunication with contractors. A site visit was deemed necessary to reassess the project and delineation, with Smith available for a visit the following Thursday after 4:30 PM.

An update was provided on a separate project involving a stream crossing. Adjustments were needed due to the crossing profile affecting stormwater management plans. Smith noted that the bank had been flagged and re-engineering was necessary to comply with new findings. He confirmed that the project was not expected to require an Army Corps permit, as the anticipated impact remained under the threshold.

The commission also discussed a proposal for a Boy Scout project at the North Pond Conservation Area. Andy Reen presented the idea, which involved a cleanup effort combined with an overnight camp out. Concerns were raised about the feasibility of camping near the pond due to conservation restrictions, and the commission deliberated on alternative locations within the conservation area.

There was a clear desire for accountability and a structured approach to managing both current and future projects. Discussions emphasized the importance of clear communication and adherence to local regulations to maintain the integrity of Southwick’s natural resources.