Southwick Planning Board Deliberates Key Amendments to Site Plan Review and ADU Bylaws

The Southwick Planning Board convened to address several issues, including significant amendments to the site plan review and accessory dwelling unit (ADU) bylaws, as well as discussions on water resource protection and infrastructure projects.

06:40At the forefront of the meeting was the proposed amendment to the site plan review bylaw, Chapter 185, Section 37, aimed at resolving inconsistencies related to non-residential accessory buildings and accessory dwelling units (ADUs). The board recognized a conflict where single-family residences and accessory structures were exempt from site plan review, potentially undermining the newly proposed ADU bylaw. A discussion ensued on ensuring that all ADUs, whether new or within existing structures, would undergo site plan review to eliminate loopholes. The board emphasized the significance of applicants providing comprehensive proposals, with the responsibility for revisions resting on them rather than the board. Discussions centered on maintaining the integrity of the review process while accommodating the practical needs of applicants, striving for a balance between regulatory oversight and project feasibility.

08:20In conjunction with the site plan review amendment, the board explored the ADU bylaw, focusing on language modifications suggested by legal counsel. Key considerations included minimizing land disturbances, ensuring architectural compatibility, providing adequate water service, and sufficient parking. The board debated the necessity of additional parking spaces, reflecting on the town’s lack of public transit and the need to remove irrelevant references. The board remained open to further revisions, preparing for the upcoming town meeting to ensure all legal considerations were addressed before finalizing the proposed amendments.

00:00Another topic was the Town Planner’s report, which addressed concerns about municipal water sources and watershed risks. The report detailed participation in discussions with representatives from UMass, Franklin Land Trust, and other stakeholders regarding current and future well locations. While West Springfield currently maintains good water quality, concerns were raised about the proximity of Southwick’s wells potentially posing future risks. The report also mentioned updates on the River Road property, which may require planning board intervention depending on final document submissions. Additionally, a notice of intent hearing for the Sam West Hudson Drive connector was announced, aiming to extend sewer and water services down Hudson Drive, though the project remains years from completion.

28:17The board also deliberated on the Earth Excavation and Wellhead Protection District special permit modification for land off Hudson Drive and Shaker Road. The applicant requested a hearing extension, which the board agreed to continue to the April 29th meeting. The proposed land swap involving a driveway crossing property lines was endorsed, recognizing its necessity to ensure compliance with zoning regulations and prevent non-conformity.

49:08In other business, the board addressed the Depot Square community project, focusing on the security reduction for stormwater infrastructure. Past concerns about one of the basins and a drain manhole cover were reviewed, with $20,000 held in escrow pending completion confirmation. Correspondence from RLA Associates documented compliance with stormwater management, recommending ongoing maintenance. The board authorized the release of escrow funds contingent on legal counsel approval, emphasizing caution until project completion was confirmed.

01:00:33The meeting also touched on the Noble Steed Crossing subdivision’s infrastructure security, with updated plans received in line with DPW comments and scheduled test pits to assess water quality. The board looked forward to updates in the next meeting.

01:23:43Finally, the board acknowledged administrative matters, approving amended meeting minutes and addressing compliance with the master plan implementation committee. Concerns were raised about the town’s e-code lacking updated bylaws, including those for pre-existing non-conforming properties and cannabis regulations. Efforts to update the online repository were discussed to ensure community needs were adequately met.

Note: This meeting summary was generated by AI, which can occasionally misspell names, misattribute actions, and state inaccuracies. This summary is intended to be a starting point and you should review the meeting record linked above before acting on anything you read. If we got something wrong, let us know. We’re working every day to improve our process in pursuit of universal local government transparency.

Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly:

Trending meetings
across the country: