A primary focus of the meeting was the proposal for estate lots on South Lum Street. The applicant proposed creating two estate lots with a common driveway on a 16.75-acre property. The planning board discussed the placement of the driveway concerning flagged wetlands, emphasizing the need for stormwater management due to anticipated disturbances. Utility information and the status of the existing house on estate lot B were also reviewed. Members raised concerns about maintaining a separation between uses on the property. The legality of having two adjacent estate lots was clarified, confirming that the required 200-foot distance between access strips was met. Public comments highlighted concerns about natural landscape preservation, with one resident questioning whether trees might be removed during development. The board assured that the 75-foot building setback would preserve some natural buffer while acknowledging property owners’ rights to clear trees, provided they adhere to setback regulations.

Another discussion revolved around the hobby garage proposal on Two States Avenue. The town planner clarified that any development on the parcel behind the BFW would require a residential component, as standalone hobby garages do not meet zoning requirements. Options for commercial recreation in the R20 District exist, but these must be accessory to residential use. This clarification was essential for understanding the zoning implications and potential development pathways for the property.

The board also considered upcoming changes to ADU regulations due to the Affordable Housing Act. Discussions included defining ADUs and permitting them in districts allowing single-family homes. Members proposed a limit of one ADU per property, with additional units possible via special permits. The possibility of confusion regarding definitions and compliance with existing bylaws was acknowledged, with particular attention to parking requirements and special permits for detached garages. This dialogue underscored the challenges of aligning current zoning regulations with new housing mandates.

The meeting addressed the planned expansion of the Losar Energy solar facility, Goban Solar. The town planner noted that the crossing of town property to connect to an electrical right of way would need initiation through the select board. This procedural detail illustrated the collaborative efforts needed between different town entities to facilitate infrastructure projects.

Public hearing continuations were a procedural theme, with the board scheduling further discussions for October 29 on various projects. Among them was a project on College Highway, where the board previously raised concerns about excessive parking. Adjustments were made to slightly exceed the minimum requirement, reducing impervious surfaces and addressing stormwater management. The board also scrutinized the septic system’s adequacy, emphasizing the importance of compliance with site plan review standards, including off-street parking and architectural design integration.

In closing, the board discussed reassessing the bond for a local project due to outdated real estate values and construction costs. This conversation highlighted the need for ongoing evaluation of development projects to reflect current economic conditions accurately.