The meeting addressed an issue affecting public health: a harmful algal bloom in Middle Pond. The Massachusetts Department of Public Health is conducting tests to determine toxin levels in the water. Signs have been posted to warn residents and keep pets away from the pond. Dr. Mueller informed the board that the bloom had dissipated by late Friday, and if toxin levels remain low for two weeks, the advisory could be lifted by October 8, 2025. Despite the lakes remaining open, caution is advised against boating, swimming, and consuming fish from the pond.

Some noted that different parties acted without a clear protocol, leading to disorganization regarding the bloom’s status and advisories. Suggestions were made to improve communication protocols among stakeholders to ensure prompt and coordinated responses to future incidents. The board recognized the past investment of $800,000 in alum treatment as crucial for managing such outbreaks and preventing a loss of recreational opportunities.

In addition to the environmental concerns, the meeting delved into the broader topic of the town’s master plan implementation. The master plan, intended as a guiding vision, became a focal point for debate among board members. Some members expressed skepticism about the feasibility of certain goals, such as the installation of electric vehicle chargers at town hall, which the board collectively decided against.

Members discussed the master plan’s role as a guiding document rather than a strict set of directives, with some noting that past plans had successfully achieved objectives like rail trails and residential subdivisions. However, current goals were perceived as potentially unrealistic, with one member remarking that “50% of the master plan can be determined not feasible.” The conversation underscored the need for flexibility in interpreting the plan and the importance of aligning it with the town’s capabilities and interests.

The debate extended to the recommendations generated from taxpayer input, highlighting a need for improved communication with residents about ongoing initiatives. A participant advocated for an open house or leadership academy to better inform the public. Additionally, the discussion touched on the practicality of various recommendations, with a consensus that they should be modified based on practical realities.

As part of the master plan dialogue, members engaged in a broader debate about the appropriate role of the select board in relation to other town entities. It was noted that various committees and groups, such as the economic development authority, are already empowered to pursue their initiatives without external guidance. The need for a clear process to modify objectives was emphasized, with members acknowledging that not all aspects of the master plan would be actionable.

The Southwick Select Board’s meeting also included discussions about infrastructure and environmental management. The Board of Health had issued warnings regarding the cyanobacteria bloom, and there were discussions about the necessity of improving communication protocols. Additionally, the meeting addressed the town’s stormwater management plan, with reports submitted under the Massachusetts small MS4 general permit. The conversation highlighted the town’s efforts to mitigate stormwater pollution and the need for improved data collection and inspection frequency.

Another topic of interest was the appointment of William Brown as the clerk to the Board of Assessors. Brown’s business background and interest in local government contributed to his selection over another candidate, Greg Dy, whose analytical efforts were recognized but whose short-term engagement raised concerns about continuity.