The first public hearing concerned a property at Three George Lumis Road, where the applicant, Ben List, sought front setback variances from George Lumis Road and North Lumis Road to rebuild a house that had been destroyed by fire. List proposed to move the foundation back due to significant cracks, intending to rebuild the house further from the road. After discussing the specific measurements and distances from the roads and neighboring properties, including the location of the septic tank, the board suggested granting a 15-foot variance from George Lumis Road and a 5-foot variance from North Lumis Street for the property.

In another discussion, an individual raised concerns regarding the construction of a new house at an unspecified location, citing the potential impact on air quality due to the close proximity of the proposed driveway to an existing house and the handling of hazardous materials. They referenced sketches and satellite images to support their claim that the new house would be closer to the existing house than the board’s conditions allowed. Additionally, they questioned the process by which the existing structure on the property was demolished and whether the handling of hazardous materials during that process was appropriate.

The second public hearing resumed the ongoing discussion about a property at Two Lakemont Street. The applicant provided updated architectural drawings and discussed adjustments made to the plans, including the proposed distances from the side, front, and rear of the property. The board inquired about discussions with the Department of Works and received assurances from the applicant. Despite the detailed scrutiny of the specific measurements and changes to the initial proposal, the board did not conclude this public hearing, opting to continue the discussion at a later date.

A particularly debate unfolded over the dimensions and setbacks for a proposed garage at Two Lakemont Street. Concerns were voiced about the distance between the garage and the neighboring property, with the potential for exhaust fumes affecting the neighboring house. Questions were raised about the demolition of an existing building and the proper supervision of hazardous materials on the property. The board approved the dimensional variances for the property, with conditions addressing the minimum distance the garage must be from the neighboring property line. This decision was made contingent on other boards reviewing the concerns raised during the meeting.