05:48The board members debated the merits of the peer review system, with some suggesting that it could serve as a method for identifying and addressing issues within the board. However, there was a consensus that such evaluations should not devolve into a cumbersome or punitive process, likened by some to a “high school prom contest.” Instead, it was suggested that any necessary evaluations should be initiated by the chairperson and vice-chairperson in a more informal and direct manner. The board leaned towards recommending that any review of members up for reappointment be handled through executive sessions rather than through the proposed peer review forms.

15:28Additionally, the meeting highlighted ongoing challenges in recruiting new members to the board. The discussion revealed a lack of interest from the community in filling board positions, attributed to the demanding nature of the work and the misconception that board members are compensated. It was suggested that further efforts be made to raise awareness and encourage participation through modern communication channels, such as social media platforms.