The sewer utility was a focal point of the meeting due to a reported operating deficit increase from $117,000 to $264,000. The Council is considering mandatory hookups to the sewer system to make it self-sustaining and examining incentives for residents to use the utility. The high sewer fees, especially burdensome for some residents, prompted discussions on methods to spread out payments over time.

In tandem with sewer system concerns, the Council broached the subject of restructuring to address failing septic systems around the town’s lakes. The possibility of generating income through this restructuring was seen as a way to alleviate the budget issues. The viability of large-scale projects, such as the town’s master plan, was also discussed, with proposals to spread costs over a five-year period.

The meeting further delved into the town’s budget allocations, particularly for the planning board, and the need for transparency regarding the use of funds. Concerns were raised about the reduced budget for the planning board in comparison to the previous year, and the professional fees associated with ongoing subcommittees. The importance of grant funding to offset costs and the workload on the land use department were considered issues.

Another major topic was the increase in wages and salaries for the police department and road repair, which together amounted to an additional $506,000. The Council clarified that staffing levels would remain unchanged and that the rise in costs was attributed to sustaining bargaining contracts. Similarly, an increase of $116,000 in salaries for public buildings and grounds was discussed, with a note that existing staff had been reassigned to new positions.

The proposed 7.45% tax increase sparked debate over its impact on taxpayers. The need to borrow for future projects and the challenges of rising public service maintenance costs were weighed against the potential reduction in expenses through the extension of debt payments and bonding.

In an effort to address the budget shortfall, the Council considered revenue-generating opportunities such as renewable energy projects. The installation of solar panels to cash in on SREX credits and the potential use of wind turbines, including a new compact design known as the T turbine, were debated. The idea of using alternative energy sources to power town buildings and the comparison of benefits between wind power and solar energy were part of the conversation.

Attracting new businesses to increase the town’s ratables was also discussed as a means to enhance revenue. Concerns were raised about the impact of a new Council on Affordable Housing (COA) agreement on the town’s housing obligations. Further discussions with experts were planned to understand the new COA agreement’s implications.