The most notable discussion centered around the application for a Club Pilates fitness center to occupy a 2,000 square foot space at the Sparta shopping center. The board clarified that the number of parking spaces at the site would remain at 153, consistent with previous arrangements, despite initial reports suggesting an increase. The representative for Club Pilates emphasized that the proposed use was consistent with the historical utilization of the location and would involve only minor interior changes, with no significant alterations to the building’s size or massing.

The application did not seek to modify the existing variance for parking, which had been previously granted, and the discussion suggested that the variance might not even be necessary due to the lack of substantial changes in square footage. The representative noted that the fitness center’s peak usage times would likely differ from other tenants in the shopping center, minimizing potential parking conflicts.

The board engineer confirmed the completeness of the application, noting minimal changes such as adjustments for egress. The board planner discussed the classification of the fitness center within zoning regulations, likening it to personal services, which are typically permitted in the area. The planner suggested that the zoning interpretation should recognize the fitness center as a permissible use.

The board members raised no concerns, and a motion to approve the application was made and seconded, leading to a decision to draft a resolution for approval without imposing any conditions.

In another matter, the board considered an application from Thomas and Kathleen Nua for a property on East Shore Trail. The Nua’s sought a variance to construct a one-car garage, a deck, and a small addition to their residence. The existing property was noted to have significant impervious surfaces and non-conforming side yard requirements, with the lot being classified as a pre-existing non-conforming area due to its size.

The proposed changes aimed to increase building coverage slightly while reducing the overall impervious coverage by removing existing structures. The representatives argued that the improvements would enhance safety and functionality without detracting from the neighborhood’s character. The board’s professional engineer supported the applicants’ arguments, and the board approved the application, emphasizing that the deck would remain uncovered and unlit.

The board then reviewed an application from Daniel and Michelle Papa for a two-car garage with a room above it on Shauny Trail. The proposal required a front yard setback variance due to the property’s unique shape and the house’s angle. The architect explained that the garage would accommodate multiple vehicles and equipment, while the room above would serve as a communal space.

The board discussed the necessity of a sight triangle easement for safety and confirmed that the existing HVAC system would suffice for the proposed modifications. The board approved the application with conditions outlined in the engineer’s report, including the submission of as-built documentation.

The final application involved Tracy Jent’s request for a front porch and balcony to improve the safety and usability of her home, especially given the steep terrain. The proposed changes would reduce impervious coverage and increase building coverage slightly, while addressing safety concerns. The board approved the application unanimously, with conditions to show all utility lines on the survey plan and document pre-existing non-conforming conditions.