The dealership’s proposal involved replacing an existing 40-foot sign with a new 29-foot 8-inch sign, which required a variance as it exceeded the standard height limits. The applicant argued that the new sign was part of a mandated rebranding effort by Toyota and emphasized its necessity for identifying certified pre-owned vehicles. Despite its height, the applicant assured the board that the sign would not appear obtrusive given the surrounding signage context on Route 22.

Concerns were raised about the sign’s safety, particularly its ability to withstand potential impacts from high-speed vehicles. The proposed sign was to be situated six feet behind existing light poles, which were expected to absorb any initial impacts, thereby reducing the risk of direct collisions with the sign itself. The board scrutinized the proposal’s adherence to local zoning requirements, emphasizing the need for clear documentation of all variances needed, including the total number of freestanding signs and their respective sizes.

In addition to the height variance for the new sign, the board addressed an existing non-conformity related to the dealership’s parking lot specifications. The site, which extends over multiple zoning districts, required an updated sign package to improve navigation and unify the property’s appearance. The dealership’s representative highlighted that while the property technically could accommodate multiple signs due to its size, the proposal aimed to modernize and organize the signage to better serve both the business and the community.

The board’s discussion led to a consensus on the merits of the dealership’s proposal, with members agreeing to certain conditions for approval. These included limiting the signage to the details provided in the revised plans, incorporating a decorative element on the building’s facade, and ensuring the signs adhered to the specified height tolerances.

Another discussion revolved around a property on Shunpike Road, where an applicant sought a variance for lot coverage to expand a driveway and add a patio. The board approved the motion unanimously, provided the applicant adhered to local fencing and drainage ordinances, especially since a pool installation was planned.

Additionally, the board considered a completed project on Hillside Avenue that required retroactive variances for a side yard and height for a fence and shed. The applicant explained the project’s completion involved changes due to a retaining wall that elevated the fence height. The board approved the application contingent on further inspection to ensure compliance with local zoning regulations, particularly concerning the structure’s proximity to the property line.

The board’s actions underscored its role in upholding zoning laws while facilitating community development, emphasizing the importance of safety measures, proper drainage systems, and maintaining neighborhood aesthetics.