The most notable issue involved the application for a lot coverage variance on New Lane, where the applicant, Steven Schwarz, sought approval for a patio that had increased impervious surface by 766 square feet. Schwarz, who had installed the patio in 2022 without obtaining the necessary permits, presented his case, arguing that the elevation of his property negated any adverse runoff impacts on neighbors. The town engineer disputed this claim, emphasizing the need for a formal drainage plan to mitigate runoff. Schwarz expressed frustration, questioning the logic behind the requirements and claiming, “this is a waste of time,” given that engineers he consulted deemed additional measures unnecessary.

The board maintained that despite the applicant’s views, compliance with ordinance 3521 was non-negotiable. This ordinance prohibits increasing stormwater runoff beyond existing conditions without adequate mitigation. The board highlighted the necessity for a comprehensive water management solution, taking into consideration projections for increased precipitation through the year 2100. The applicant was urged to explore options such as dry wells to manage the runoff effectively, pointing out that engineering opinions do not replace legal processes and compliance requirements.

Here, the applicant sought variances for lot coverage and rear yard setback to accommodate a 14 by 33-foot inground pool. The board scrutinized the proposed impervious coverage, noting discrepancies between initial and revised plans, and emphasized the need for a mitigation strategy to handle additional runoff.

The applicant argued that the undersized lot and existing home constraints made it challenging to meet the required 15-foot rear yard setback. However, the board suggested considering adjustments to the pool’s placement to reduce coverage and increase setbacks. During the discussion, concerns about pool equipment proximity to property lines and potential noise disturbances were also raised, with board members urging the applicant to explore alternative equipment locations.

The board’s insistence on compliance with zoning laws extended to safety regulations for pool installations, particularly regarding fencing and self-latching gates, which are required to prevent accidents. The applicant acknowledged the need for these measures and was open to adjustments to align with legal standards.

The meeting also highlighted the complexities involved in zoning approvals, as discussions revealed ongoing interactions with engineering departments and the need for clarity on previous recommendations by the town’s zoning officer. The board’s decision to carry the pool application to the next meeting was aimed at allowing time for the applicant to revise plans and seek further guidance from engineering professionals.