St. Cloud School Board Approves Safety and Facility Upgrades Amid Budget Discussions

The St. Cloud School Board meeting on April 16, 2025, covered several topics, with a focus on approving safety and facility upgrades at Apollo High School following the successful passage of two referendum questions. The meeting also addressed the non-renewal of certain teachers’ contracts, the approval of the 2025-2026 compensatory revenue plan, and ongoing facility improvements across the district.

52:07The board’s approval to canvas the returns of votes from a recent special election was a highlight, as both referendum questions received more “yes” votes than “no” votes. This outcome enables critical safety and security updates at Apollo High School and secures funding for constructing an indoor multi-purpose activity space at the same school. Superintendent Laurie Putnam expressed gratitude for the community’s support, emphasizing the importance of public participation and the democratic process in achieving these milestones. She acknowledged the board’s leadership and advocacy in engaging and rallying community support.

10:39In addition to the referendum outcomes, the meeting delved into ongoing and planned facility upgrades throughout the district. Notable projects include new flooring and reconfigured spaces at North Junior High, locker system replacements at South Junior High, and enhancements to pre-kindergarten and playground areas at Oak Hill. The board discussed the need for safe and functional environments, with plans to replace tennis courts at Oak Hill and Kennedy schools to accommodate the growing interest in pickleball. These developments are part of the district’s broader strategy to maintain and improve educational facilities, funded primarily through the long-term facility maintenance fund and supplementary contributions from specific schools.

54:27Another topic was the non-renewal of certain teachers’ contracts, which sparked discussion. The board emphasized that non-renewal decisions involve a comprehensive evaluation process over a three-year period before tenure is granted. Affected teachers may be rehired as needs change throughout the school year. The choir program, involving multiple schools and principals, was notably mentioned.

58:31The approval of the 2025-2026 compensatory revenue plan was another major agenda item. The plan determines the allocation of funds tied to the number of students qualifying for free and reduced lunch. The district withholds up to 20% of this revenue for district-wide allocation, aiming to ensure consistent support across schools, particularly those with lower compensatory revenue. The executive director of finance and business services highlighted the district’s conservative budgeting approach, mentioning a potential $485,000 reduction in revenue due to a pending budget proposal from the governor. The board acknowledged the importance of planning for potential changes in funding, with 39 full-time equivalent positions funded through the 20% holdback, which include elementary grade-level leads and secondary specialists.

01:04:11Further discussions touched on the implications of the free lunch program on families’ willingness to complete applications, potentially leading to underreported numbers of qualifying students. The need for a more equitable long-term funding solution was acknowledged, as disparities in compensatory revenue allocation between districts were highlighted.

01:10:35The board also reviewed Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) projections for the 2025-2026 academic year, presented by the executive directors of human resources and finance. Changes in FTE were linked to student enrollments and course registrations, with special education staffing needs being a concern due to rising student numbers and case loads. The board recognized the critical role of staffing planning in effectively addressing these needs, despite the anticipated reduction in compensatory revenue.

01:13:29Additionally, the board discussed revisions to policy 701 on budget establishment, allowing for the use of available fund balances for temporary relief in budget shortfalls, aligning with best practices in budget management.

Note: This meeting summary was generated by AI, which can occasionally misspell names, misattribute actions, and state inaccuracies. This summary is intended to be a starting point and you should review the meeting record linked above before acting on anything you read. If we got something wrong, let us know. We’re working every day to improve our process in pursuit of universal local government transparency.

Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly:

Trending meetings
across the country: