The primary focus of the meeting was the approval of the 2026 budget, which included a 5.3% increase in the city tax levy. This budget aimed to address various priorities, such as public safety, housing stability, and economic development. Council members expressed gratitude for the collaborative process, with one member noting the transparency and productivity of this year’s budget cycle. The budget emphasized investments in public safety, maintaining resources for the police and fire departments, and funding for libraries and recreation centers. One council member explicitly stated the importance of not cutting firefighter resources. Additionally, the council reiterated its support for affordable housing initiatives, including down payment assistance and eviction prevention programs.

The council also deliberated on the Mississippi River Corridor critical area and flood management overlay districts ordinance. A significant amendment proposed reverting height restrictions to the original staff recommendations from the planning commission. This amendment aimed to allow more subjective reviews of building projects along the river, balancing the need for economic development with environmental protection. Several council members supported the amendment, recognizing the importance of public oversight and flexibility in major developments. However, this proposal sparked debate among community members during the public hearing. Some residents advocated for maintaining objective height restrictions to avoid inconsistencies in development approvals, while others supported the amendment for promoting downtown revitalization. A representative from the St. Paul Bird Alliance highlighted ecological concerns, advocating for the inclusion of bird-safe requirements in the ordinance.

Public safety also dominated the discussion, with council members emphasizing the need for accountability and transparency in law enforcement actions. A community member raised concerns about a federal immigration action involving police officers, calling for the release of body-worn camera footage and reports related to the incident. The speaker urged the council to protect constitutional rights for journalists and observers and enforce the city’s separation ordinance regarding immigration enforcement. These comments highlighted the ongoing tension between law enforcement practices and community trust, prompting the council to consider measures for increased oversight and community engagement in policing matters.

In budget deliberations, council members reflected on the importance of community engagement and the alignment of budgetary decisions with residents’ values. The budget aimed to restore funding for essential services, including libraries and recreation centers, previously proposed for cuts. Additionally, the council emphasized the significance of investing in staff safety and accessibility through office renovations. The council also considered the Port Authority’s staffing as an economic development engine, linking increased staffing to the broader goal of expanding the tax base.

The meeting also addressed the need for sustainable library funding sources. Council members discussed ensuring the purchasing power for library collections and reducing reliance on temporary funding sources, such as cultural start funds. Members acknowledged that while support from foundations is appreciated, it does not cover staff salaries, which constitute a portion of departmental budgets.

Further, the council discussed the allocation of opioid settlement funds, with a second amendment introduced to accelerate the timeline for a request for information on their expenditure. Debate arose over whether these funds should support the “Returning Home Saint Paul” program, which focuses on housing stability for individuals transitioning from incarceration. Some council members expressed concern over the lack of a plan for opioid settlement spending, advocating for a more collaborative approach with the county to ensure coordinated investment strategies.

The council’s deliberations highlighted the challenge of balancing immediate community needs with long-term planning objectives. Members worked to incorporate public input while navigating fiscal constraints. Acknowledgments were given to city staff and colleagues for their contributions to the budget process.