01:06:53The most notable topic of discussion was the introduction of admission fees at Como Zoo, a suggestion that sparked considerable debate. The idea, aimed at bolstering revenue, was met with reservations from council members who stressed the importance of keeping the zoo accessible, especially for low-income families. The council underscored the zoo’s role as a free public amenity, with one member emphasizing affordability and accessibility as crucial components for local residents. Suggestions to increase voluntary donations from visitors were proposed as an alternative to admission fees, with an emphasis on transparency in fundraising efforts. Council members suggested providing a recommended donation amount. This approach was seen as a way to balance community engagement with financial sustainability.

01:19:25The conversation also touched on offering discounts or free programs for Saint Paul residents compared to non-residents. Concerns were voiced about the potential decline in attendance if fees were imposed, and ideas about creating incentives for local visitors were discussed. The council recognized the importance of understanding visitor demographics to inform funding and resource allocation decisions. Discussions revealed that only 16% of visitors are Saint Paul residents, yet local taxpayers bear a portion of the zoo’s costs. This disparity prompted considerations of how best to serve local families while managing financial viability.

07:00Financial matters were a central theme throughout the meeting, with the council examining various funding sources for the zoo. The operating budget for 2025 was revealed to be approximately $13.4 million, supported by general fund contributions, donations, and state support. The zoo’s financial sustainability was scrutinized, especially in light of historical funding levels, which have trended upward over the past decade. The presentation noted the operating cost per visitor is around $7.30, highlighting the zoo’s accessibility compared to other cultural destinations with higher admission fees.

21:13The council explored additional revenue generation opportunities, particularly focusing on staffing at concession stands, which was noted as inconsistent. Partnerships with organizations like Como Friends were emphasized as vital for fundraising efforts, with the management team seeking ways to enhance revenue through these collaborations.

34:05The meeting also addressed the zoo’s asset preservation efforts, with a report indicating that Como Friends raised over $2 million in 2024 for these initiatives. Discussions included a significant request for $20 million for asset preservation, particularly for the next phase of the big cat exhibit. This project has faced delays in state funding approval. Concerns were raised about the feasibility of such large-scale projects, especially considering past construction impacts on animal behavior.

01:00:21Another topic was the feasibility study on paid parking at the zoo. Conducted by the Zoo Advisors, the study recommended against pursuing a paid parking program due to potential negative financial impacts. The council revisited a 2019 parking study, which also showed negative net revenue trends. The ongoing dialogue highlighted the challenges of balancing revenue generation with maintaining a free and accessible experience for visitors.