The appeal by the University of Saint Thomas drew attention as it involved a conditional use permit (CUP) condition mandating the removal of the Goodrich Avenue driveway, a topic that has sparked debate over safety and accessibility. The driveway currently provides access to the university’s South Campus, including the Brady Education Center. The Planning Commission had previously upheld the condition requiring the driveway’s removal, citing compliance with city policies that prioritize neighborhood compatibility. However, representatives from the university argued that this decision overlooked crucial safety considerations.

During the meeting, various speakers highlighted the necessity of the Goodrich Avenue access point for emergency vehicles, reflecting on past incidents where the driveway proved vital. A representative from the university, Tamara Team, emphasized that the Planning Commission’s findings did not adequately account for safety needs, arguing that the driveway is essential for emergency responses and should be preserved with added restrictions. Community members echoed these concerns, noting the potential negative impact on emergency response times if the driveway were closed.

Opposition to the university’s appeal was also voiced, notably by the Summit Avenue Residential Preservation Association, which argued that removing the driveway aligns with the city’s comprehensive plan and existing agreements. They contended that maintaining the driveway could exacerbate traffic congestion and undermine neighborhood safety, particularly during large events at the university.

The council members deliberated on the matter, considering the Planning Commission’s rationale, the university’s arguments, and public testimonies.

In addition to the university appeal, the council addressed several zoning and regulatory matters. Two appeals by Sean Ryan of Ryan Companies were discussed, involving proposed developments on Fort Parkway and 0 Avenue South.

The meeting also included the final adoption of ordinance 25 Dash 5, concerning the rezoning of properties on Grand Avenue. However, with only four council members present, the item was postponed until the next session to meet the required five votes for approval.

A public hearing on ordinance 25 Dash 6, which proposed amendments to the city’s water rates, was another focal point. The council reviewed updates to the Saint Paul Regional Water Services Code, which incorporated technological advancements and proposed a new fee schedule to ensure transparency in rate adjustments. Although no public testimony was presented, the council acknowledged the importance of these updates in modernizing the water system and ensuring clean water access.

All items were laid over for final adoption at the next meeting.

Aside from legislative matters, the meeting included announcements of community events and initiatives designed to enhance resident engagement and awareness. The council members expressed gratitude for the public’s participation, particularly given the challenging weather conditions on the meeting day.