The rezoning proposal for the Hams Brewery site was a focal point of the meeting, inciting passionate responses from both supporters and opponents. Aimed at transforming the site from an industrial (I2) to a mixed-use (T3) zoning designation, the proposal sought to introduce higher-density residential units alongside commercial spaces. This change aligns with St. Paul’s comprehensive plan, which designates the area as a mixed-use opportunity site. The district council endorsed the rezoning, but the planning commission recommended against it for two parcels, prompting a public hearing to evaluate the community’s stance.

Director Nicole Newton, representing the Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA), advocated for the rezoning, highlighting the site’s historical significance and the potential for community enrichment through the proposed development, which includes nearly 200 housing units. Newton emphasized the project’s alignment with the city’s goals, which include preserving historic buildings and enhancing neighborhood connectivity through structured and public parking.

Public testimony revealed split opinions. Proponents like Jacob Hooper and Tim Marino argued that the development would alleviate the city’s housing crisis, particularly in areas with high eviction rates, and provide affordable housing while preserving community values. They underscored the importance of increased housing availability and the potential economic boost from new residents.

Conversely, opponents cited concerns over parking and business impact. Fred Stenberg and Cheryl Peterson, representing local businesses, warned that reduced parking could harm existing establishments like St. Paul Brewery. Others, like Regina Clapp, labeled the rezoning as illegal spot zoning. Residents like Patrick Kelly expressed fears that the development would exacerbate existing parking shortages and negatively impact neighborhood dynamics.

Despite the divergent views, the council voted in favor of expressing intent to approve the rezoning, initiating a series of further discussions. Councilmembers emphasized the need for ongoing dialogue with community members and businesses.

The meeting also addressed the reappointment of Barton Butch Inks as the fire chief, with unanimous council support. Inks’ leadership during the COVID-19 pandemic and his long-standing commitment to public safety were lauded by city officials. Councilmembers praised his approachable nature and the fire department’s role in community resilience, particularly their assistance with the bridge fund during the health crisis. The council’s endorsement reflected broad appreciation for his service and leadership.

Fiscal matters featured prominently, with the issuance of sewer revenue green bonds to fund sewer capital projects. The competitive sale attracted bids, and Stonex offered the lowest interest rate, although higher than the previous year. The council approved the bond issuance, acknowledging the need for updated budget figures.

Discussions on downtown revitalization efforts revealed setbacks, with no significant approvals for redevelopment tax increment financing (TIF) or liquor licenses due to legislative impasses. The failure to extend the half-cent sales tax and modify local programs highlighted the complexities of securing funding for urban projects. Despite this, the city secured a TIF extension for the Ford site and maintained local government aid levels.

The council addressed a variance appeal from Stronger Sober House, seeking to establish a supportive housing facility. Public testimony highlighted the challenges posed by recent reclassification of spacing requirements, potentially limiting the facility’s operation. Community concerns centered on neighborhood integration and the impact of clustered supportive housing facilities.

Finally, the council discussed environmental initiatives, approving funding for urban forestry grants and emergency medical services, while navigating significant cuts to public transportation funding.