The most notable topic discussed was the approval of resolution RAE 26-1-25, which allows the executive director, Nicolle Newton, to consent to and execute environmental covenants and easements for projects where the authority acts as a lender. This change aims to streamline processes related to environmental remediation at redevelopment sites where contaminants may exist. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) oversees these remediation measures and may require ongoing maintenance or land use restrictions through environmental covenants. The board reached a consensus, agreeing that this procedural change would enhance efficiency, aligning with MPCA’s mandates.

Questions arose regarding the oversight of projects requiring these environmental covenants, particularly concerning environmental justice objectives. It was clarified that the Housing & Redevelopment Authority’s oversight primarily involves approving financing for redevelopment projects, with the MPCA retaining jurisdiction over the remediation process. Importantly, it was emphasized that consenting to environmental covenants does not imply liability on the part of the Housing Redevelopment Authority. The resolution was approved unanimously, with five affirmative votes.

Following this decision, the board shifted its attention to proposed updates for the Saint Paul Commercial Corridors program guidelines, presented in a staff report on SR 26-8. Andy Burnham, the program manager, outlined recommended changes based on feedback from corridor organizations. These recommendations focused on extending geographical boundaries to include more businesses and increasing operational grant amounts. Specifically, proposed changes included extending the boundaries of three corridors: the West boundary of the Support Parkway corridor would stretch from Green Avenue to Mississippi River Boulevard, the East 7th corridor from Arcade to 4th Street, and the Como-Dale corridor by several blocks. Conversely, the 5th Avenue corridor, deemed a “micro corridor,” was recommended for removal due to its limited number of businesses and high percentage of residential land use.

The discussion also addressed the funding structure, which previously offered flat amounts based on proximity to areas of concentrated poverty. The recommendation was to categorize corridors into “medium” or “large” based on the number of businesses they serve, with a threshold of 300 businesses differentiating the categories. This would allow for tailored funding amounts and a more equitable distribution of resources. Some board members expressed concerns about using the number of businesses as the sole metric for funding allocation. Despite differing opinions on the metrics, there was general support for the proposed adjustments to better align the program with the needs of businesses within the corridors.

Significant discussions also revolved around the Commercial Corridor Organization Assistance Program guidelines, with proposals to revisit them for approval by February 11. There was notable concern about removing Smith Avenue from the program’s corridors, described as a “big deal” by one member. The conversation included suggestions to incorporate metrics such as “businesses per mile” and corridor length, acknowledging vacancies and emphasizing potential opportunities for future businesses. Improved outreach and collaboration with local business organizations, like the Rondo Community Land Trust, were also emphasized to support community initiatives and leverage funding sources.

A key point of contention involved the ineligibility of operational support for businesses within the program. One member expressed frustration, noting that businesses have been adversely affected by issues like construction work and economic challenges, leading to revenue loss. They requested clarity on advocating for operational support funding and what legislative changes might be necessary to adjust the guidelines to allow for such assistance. The director of the organization responded by indicating that discussions would continue to explore available options for business assistance, considering funding restrictions.