The council dedicated substantial time to the proposal to establish Development District Number Four and TIF District 4-1. Tammy Yall from Northland Public Finance presented the TIF plan, which aims to facilitate the redevelopment of approximately 26 acres, including rental apartments, single-family homes, and townhomes. The TIF mechanism would capture increased property taxes from the development to fund improvements, projecting an annual tax increment revenue of about $470,000 once fully developed by 2028.

One of the primary concerns raised during the meeting was the financial stability of the developer involved in the TIF project. A council member questioned the timing and thoroughness of reviewing the developer’s financial statements, emphasizing the necessity for financial scrutiny before committing future taxpayer dollars. While the developer had submitted financial information to Northland Public Finance, specifics were not disclosed, leaving room for further evaluation in upcoming meetings. The council was urged to ensure that the project would not proceed without the proposed financial assistance unless it was genuinely needed, further highlighting the importance of financial accountability.

They emphasized that approving the TIF plan was a preliminary step that allowed for further reconsideration and detailed negotiations in future meetings. Concerns about infrastructure needs and costs were acknowledged, with the understanding that these would be clarified as discussions progressed.

The meeting also addressed the contentious issue of modifying a CUP for a recovery facility at 950 9th Avenue, operated by Crescendo Chemical Health. Ted Herman and Jennifer Fraser John spoke in favor of the proposal, seeking to transition the facility from a high-intensity inpatient model to a recovery residence. They argued that outpatient treatment would benefit clients further along in their recovery journey and would not require 24/7 supervision. Herman highlighted a disconnect between neighborhood objections and the realities of substance use issues.

During the discussions, the Planning Commission’s recommendation to deny the CUP amendment was noted. The commission expressed concerns about the shift to a model relying on off-site services. Despite this, the council decided not to immediately adopt the resolution for denial, opting instead to allow time for additional research and communication with stakeholders to explore potential compromises.

In other matters, the council approved updates to the Marathon Refinery’s CUP, which involved adding a structure exceeding height requirements. Although this addition was not visible from the river, the Department of Natural Resources had no objections, and the Planning Commission recommended approval, highlighting potential operational efficiency improvements and reduced emissions.

The council also introduced new cannabis business regulations set to start on January 1. These regulations require cannabis retail businesses to register with the city and adhere to zoning ordinances that include buffer zones from sensitive locations such as schools and daycare centers. The ordinance was crafted with input from the Planning Commission, which advocated for maximum buffer distances to balance business opportunities with public safety. The council approved the cannabis ordinance.