Members raised concerns about the potential of neglecting existing buildings’ infrastructure, stressing the interconnectedness of infrastructure improvements and community safety. The discussion acknowledged the complexities of identifying blight, particularly since much of it lies beneath the surface, and considered whether a CRA could fund improvements to shared resources, such as sewage pipes, requiring collaboration with adjacent jurisdictions.

The proposed CRA aims to integrate resilience and infrastructure as core elements of the assessment process. This initiative is expected to involve collaboration with Pinellas County, leveraging funding opportunities through tax increment financing (TIF) strategies. Discussions also touched on the implications of extending CRA boundaries into waterway areas, suggesting potential adaptations in funding strategies, possibly utilizing pump station funding to offset costs associated with piping.

The conversation highlighted the necessity of articulating specific project goals to engage the county effectively in discussions regarding TIF contributions. Additionally, there was a strong focus on the need for a plan encompassing a wide range of projects to ensure alignment with city and county objectives. Concerns were expressed about the potential perception of St. Pete Beach as a blighted area, which could impact property values. However, the CRA’s primary goal remains increasing property values, thereby potentially putting the CRA out of business if successful.

The meeting further explored the framework for evaluating the comprehensive plan, particularly the town center zoning districts, in light of recent storm impacts. The town center area, comprising TC1 and TC2 zoning districts, was discussed as a focal point for redevelopment, with an emphasis on aligning zoning with land use. The comprehensive plan promotes a live-work-play environment, with safe multimodal linkages and commercial revitalization as key objectives. However, challenges persist due to a high density of legal non-conforming uses, complicating zoning and land use compatibility.

The complexities of zoning compatibility were highlighted, with concerns that existing buffer and setback requirements, particularly for mixed-use developments next to residential zones, create obstacles for developers. The need for a thorough reassessment of zoning and land use policies was underscored, particularly as the city seeks to accommodate redevelopment efforts. Concerns were also raised about the adequacy of the current comprehensive plan in addressing ongoing issues and its ability to facilitate property owner redevelopment.

Participants noted the necessity of addressing outdated ordinances that may hinder recovery efforts for property owners impacted by storms. Specific examples, such as limitations on elevating structures in flood-prone areas, were cited as areas requiring immediate attention. The meeting emphasized the importance of reviewing and updating these ordinances to avoid unintended consequences that may impede recovery efforts.

Key legislative changes affecting local governance were also discussed, including the implications of Senate Bill 180, which places limitations on municipalities regarding development until October 2027. This bill excludes maintenance or changes in use from being classified as development, affecting zoning and planning activities. Additionally, Senate Bill 1730 was noted for its amendments impacting mixed-use affordable housing, while Senate Bill 1622 restored recreational customary use rights in beach areas, simplifying the process for municipalities to prove these rights.