24:13A significant portion of the meeting was devoted to discussing two demolition cases. The first involved a residence on Gulf Way, where the owner sought approval to demolish a hurricane-damaged single-family home. The commission unanimously approved the demolition, noting that the lot could accommodate a new residence without affecting the owner’s rights. The second case involved a duplex at 108 20th Avenue. The owners sought to demolish a damaged dwelling and an outbuilding. The property, documented in historical surveys since 1936, had suffered extensive hurricane damage. Despite eligibility for a 30-day delay, the commission supported immediate demolition, recognizing the economic burden of repairs that exceeded the property’s market value.

26:46The owner of 108 20th Avenue expressed frustration, citing the high repair costs and the extensive damage that made reconstruction economically unfeasible. The commission suggested exploring historic designation to enable a FEMA variance, but the owner preferred demolition due to uncertainties surrounding the repairs. The commission clarified that any new construction would adhere to the existing footprint unless converted to a single-family residence, which allowed for a larger structure. The commission also emphasized the limitations on rebuilding, particularly regarding the conversion of carport space to living space within established setbacks.

48:13Height regulation amendments for CRD 8th Avenue were another focal point. The commission reviewed proposed changes to clarify building height definitions. The amendments aimed to prevent structures from exceeding the 35-foot height limit above the required lowest floor elevation, addressing concerns that previous regulations allowed unintended height increases. The commission discussed the importance of clear definitions within the ordinance to guide future developments and prevent additional stories beyond intended limits.

01:15:59Concerns about utility communication poles also featured prominently. Residents expressed dissatisfaction with the installation of a tall pole on Maritana Drive, questioning the historic board’s role in its approval. The commission clarified that while the historic board could recommend design aspects, it lacked authority over pole height and placement due to preemptive legislation. Plans were discussed to lower the pole’s height and potentially relocate it to address residents’ concerns.

01:01:21The meeting also addressed the status of historic city facilities. The commission discussed upcoming projects for Warren Webster and the Sunan Art Center, highlighting the need for repairs and FEMA reimbursement. The potential demolition of The Bait Shack and the Shuffleboard Court Clubhouse was noted, alongside roof repairs for Warren Webster that received approval. The commission emphasized the importance of maintaining these facilities while navigating the complexities of preservation and funding.

01:06:38In addition, public fundraising for historic properties, particularly Mary Pier, was discussed. Questions arose about existing policies for soliciting donations, reflecting community interest in contributing to the pier’s reconstruction. The commission highlighted the need for transparency and adherence to proper channels, acknowledging that Mary Pier, though not officially designated, was eligible for historic status. The commission considered forming a community group to support fundraising efforts, emphasizing the importance of clear procedures and board involvement.