St. Pete Beach Historic Preservation Board Approves Multiple Historic Designations Amid Storm Recovery Concerns

The recent meeting of the St. Pete Beach Historic Preservation Board was marked by notable decisions on historic designations for various properties, discussions on storm recovery efforts, and considerations for new infrastructure impacting the city’s historical landscape. Notably, the Board unanimously approved several local historic designations, which some property owners sought to help preserve their homes, many of which had minor storm damage.

0:00A key highlight of the meeting was the unanimous approval of local historic designations for properties that hold architectural and historical significance. One such property, located at 108 12th Avenue and owned by Cheryl Abraham, was particularly noteworthy due to its personal and historical value. Abraham, participating remotely, expressed her deep connection to the house, having been born and raised there. She emphasized the importance of maintaining the property’s historical integrity, mentioning that it had been reaffirmed as a contributing resource in the city’s historic resources survey. Despite some damage to the porch lattice, the property was largely unaffected by recent storms, allowing the board to focus on its historical significance rather than restoration needs.

20:44Another property that garnered attention was 400 Pass-A-Grille Way. Built in 1910 in the Craftsman style, this house was associated with early community figures PG and Emma Waldren. The board supported its designation due to its architectural significance and the owners’ commitment to restoration. This sentiment was echoed in the board’s decision to approve historic designations for additional properties, including those on Pass-A-Grille Way, 3521 Casablanca Avenue, and 1081 15th Avenue, each contributing unique historical narratives and architectural styles to the city’s heritage.

1:32:11In tandem with these designations, the board also tackled issues related to storm damage and its impact on historic properties. The Don Vista Onan Art Center and Warren Webster building, both of which sustained minimal damage, were discussed in terms of necessary repairs and potential relisting. The shuffleboard building faced more severe structural challenges, prompting discussions on possible demolition and reconstruction that respects the site’s historical context. Throughout these discussions, the board emphasized the need for a balance between maintaining historical integrity and adapting to modern regulations and environmental conditions.

0:00An ongoing theme was the intersection of historical preservation with practical considerations following storm damage. The board addressed substantial damage letters sent to homeowners, clarifying processes and exploring options for those with historic properties. The discussion covered the appeal process for homeowners contesting damage assessments and the implications for properties designated as historic. The board assured homeowners that historic designation provided certain protections and encouraged them to document any discrepancies in damage evaluations.

2:17:32Simultaneously, the board addressed new infrastructure developments, specifically concerning small wireless facilities. Following a presentation on the Advanced Wireless Facilities Infrastructure Deployment Act, the board deliberated on proposed pole replacements in historically significant areas like Pass-A-Grille. The discussion focused on ensuring that new installations, such as taller poles, align with existing structures in design and color to minimize visual disruption. The board expressed a desire to limit the height and visibility of these installations.

The meeting concluded with a public announcement regarding the Corey Avenue area historic survey grant, set to commence shortly. This initiative aims to further document and preserve the city’s historic landscape.

Note: This meeting summary was generated by AI, which can occasionally misspell names, misattribute actions, and state inaccuracies. This summary is intended to be a starting point and you should review the meeting record linked above before acting on anything you read. If we got something wrong, let us know. We’re working every day to improve our process in pursuit of universal local government transparency.

Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly: