The most contentious element of the meeting was the debate over the proposed ordinance’s implications for beach use and lighting restrictions during turtle nesting season. A section of the ordinance, section 4410, would prohibit all special events near the beach from February 15 to the end of turtle season in October. This restriction would effectively ban weddings, birthdays, and pool parties during this timeframe, which raised concerns from community members and local businesses. Kristen Simmons from the Loose Hotel highlighted the potential impact on hospitality businesses, indicating that such broad restrictions could hinder their event hosting capabilities, affecting income and client confidence. The ordinance’s broad definitions of “artificial” and “transient” lighting were criticized for being vague, potentially penalizing businesses for light from vehicles or unrelated sources.

The board discussed the need for clear guidelines to inform event organizers on how to comply with lighting standards legally. The conversation touched on the necessity of balancing ecological protections with community and business interests. Suggestions included providing detailed lighting recommendations and engaging experts to draft clearer language for the ordinance. The board agreed on the importance of ensuring that restrictions do not unduly restrict economic activity while protecting sea turtles and other wildlife.

Another concern was the ordinance’s impact on the use of micro-mobility devices, such as bicycles and ebikes, on the beach. There was a divide among board members over banning all types of bikes, including human-powered ones, due to safety concerns. Some members emphasized the need for a thorough assessment of the risks, while others advocated for alternative measures to mitigate potential dangers without imposing a complete ban.

The ordinance also proposed a prohibition on fireworks year-round, with exceptions during marine turtle and shorebird nesting seasons. The board examined whether the ordinance’s language should be amended to allow barge-launched fireworks, as the current wording might leave room for interpretation.

The meeting also addressed the regulation of temporary structures on the beach, such as tiki and cheeky huts. The transition of these regulations from the land development code to a consolidated chapter was intended to streamline access to beach regulations. Concerns were raised about enforcement and the potential for confusion regarding permits and exemptions.

In discussing the regulation of lighting, particularly during special events, members acknowledged the need for revisions to the ordinance to ensure compliance with ecological protections while allowing community events to proceed. A motion was proposed to send the ordinance back to staff for reworking based on the discussions held, which received unanimous support from the board.