State
- Filters
- MA
- Franklin County
- 7/2/25
- 07/07/2025
- 23 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: In a recent meeting, the Shutesbury Board of Health discussed the potential benefits of transitioning from the current public health district to collaborating with a regional health collaborative. The board believes this move could enhance service delivery and provide a more sustainable model for public health management in the area.
- MA
- Essex County
- 7/2/25
- 07/02/2025
- 131 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: In a reshuffle, the Marblehead School Committee elected Al Williams as its new chair, succeeding Jen Schaeffner. This leadership change followed a contentious meeting where various issues, including governance, procedural transparency, and policy updates, were vigorously debated.
- MA
- Essex County
- 7/2/25
- 07/08/2025
- 29 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Newbury Planning Board meeting faced an unexpected halt due to a lack of quorum, causing significant delays in the agenda, particularly affecting the anticipated public hearing for the Seagate development on High Road and other ongoing projects.
- MA
- Bristol County
- 7/2/25
- 07/03/2025
- 41 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Fall River Park Board meeting on July 2nd saw developments, including the approval of a community garden initiative funded by Love Your Block and a decision to transfer jurisdiction of a park area to allow for more flexible community events. Other topics included scheduling conflicts for park use, requests for tree removals, and procedural clarifications concerning past meeting minutes.
- MA
- Worcester County
- 7/2/25
- 07/07/2025
- 36 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: During the recent Gardner Airport Commission meeting, a issue emerged regarding a typographical error in a grant agreement from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). The original agreement inaccurately stated that the FAA would cover 90% of the project costs instead of the correct 95%. This discrepancy raised concerns about the potential financial implications for the city. The individual addressing the commission emphasized the importance of clarity, stating that such a percentage difference represented a financial burden on the city. The commission noted the necessity of revising the grant agreement to reflect the correct funding percentage, with plans to prepare a contract with Gail Associates for the project work order once the revision was confirmed.
