01:14:37One notable issue discussed was a drainage complaint that had persisted for approximately two decades. Attendees Paul Hansen and John M. highlighted the unresolved problem, which required filling in drains on both sides of a specific road. They explained that the drainage issues had resulted in significant flooding, exacerbated by historical changes to the drainage system, including the improper installation of a culvert. The culvert, believed to have been installed in the late 1980s or early 2000s, was set lower than its original elevation, leading to ineffective water management and persistent flooding. The board acknowledged the need for an engineer to assess the situation and determine the appropriate steps to restore the county road ditch to its original state. The urgency of the situation was underscored with the potential for the county to enforce financial responsibilities on property owners if they fail to comply with the restoration order.

22:44In a move to address maintenance and infrastructure needs, the board approved bids from Lakeside and KRB for gravel maintenance on various county roads. Lakeside’s bid amounted to $111,900 for certain road segments, while KRB’s bid was lower at $86,450 for another segment. The board emphasized the importance of staying within budget, with approximately $29,000 remaining after accepting the bids. Crack sealing progress on County Road 11 was also discussed, noting that around six miles had been completed despite weather interruptions. The board expressed a commitment to ensuring effective results without excessive product usage.

01:42:31Attention then turned to architectural services for courthouse improvements, with Bartlett and West from Bismarck selected for their innovative technology and keen interest in the building’s historical preservation. Their use of a digital 3D modeling program for capturing detailed measurements was highlighted as a significant advantage for obtaining accurate contractor bids. The board approved their selection unanimously, recognizing the need for a comprehensive analysis of the building’s needs and a long-term improvement plan.

39:51The meeting also delved into insurance matters, focusing on the county’s reserve fund and potential adjustments to policy deductibles and coverages. Discussions included the $2 million tort cap for negligence claims and the exploration of cyber liability coverage enhancements. The board considered higher deductibles for auto policies as a potential cost-saving measure, specifically for non-squad vehicles. A recommendation was made for commercial inland marine insurance to adopt a blanket coverage approach, simplifying the policy and reducing the risk of claim denials due to incorrect item listings.

01:58:48Further discussions centered on equalization processes, with updates on exemptions and property valuations. A notable increase in the primary residence credit from $500 to $1,600 was reported, benefiting 306 residents. The board acknowledged the need for synchronization in assessments to avoid perceived inequities and emphasized communication with residents regarding tax exemptions and the assessment process.

01:33:20The meeting concluded with discussions on budgetary constraints and the implications of a 3% cap on general funds for the 2026 budget. Concerns were raised about a department exceeding its budget due to new equipment purchases, with grants suggested as a means to alleviate excess spending. The board expressed a desire for early budget finalization to avoid last-minute issues and planned to meet with department heads to review budgets and needs.