A significant part of the meeting focused on the preliminary plan for the Stratton Hill development, which involves a 700-acre site with plans for 35 lots on the Ayer side and 38 on the Groton side. Community members expressed concerns about the development’s impact on local infrastructure, particularly roads and sewer systems. Discussions revealed the need for substantial off-site improvements, including road repairs, prior to the issuance of building permits. This would ensure construction-related damage is mitigated, with financial securities potentially required to guarantee completion.

Environmental preservation was a point of contention, particularly regarding the project’s proximity to Long Pond, a critical habitat. One resident highlighted the potential ecological impact, emphasizing the need for an impact study to assess how the development could affect the pond’s water quality. Concerns about increased nutrient loads and the associated costs of vegetation control were also discussed. A member of the planning board assured that these environmental concerns would be taken seriously, with the board closely examining potential impacts.

The traffic study conducted for the project was deemed insufficient by several attendees, who noted it failed to account for local road conditions, including narrow widths and blind curves. The study’s conclusion that the development would not impact overall operations was met with skepticism. The committee acknowledged plans for a peer review to address these concerns, with a clear emphasis on considering pedestrian and cyclist needs alongside vehicle traffic.

The planning and approval process, including the role of the conservation commission, was another area of focus. It was noted that while preliminary plans are optional, they provide an opportunity to work out design details without incurring full engineering costs. The importance of collaboration between the planning board and the conservation commission was emphasized to ensure public concerns are addressed. A request for proposals for a conservation analysis was recently issued, with plans for a peer review by the end of August.

Several waivers were discussed in relation to the preliminary plan, including those for the landscape plan, road striping, and test hole data. A boulevard entrance was proposed to minimize visual impact and site disruption, although the necessity of a second entrance was questioned. The planning board and community members expressed a desire for additional feedback on these design elements.

Concerns about compliance with state affordability guidelines were raised regarding the four affordable housing units included in the plan. Guidance from local housing authorities was sought to ensure proper adherence to regulations. Street lighting preferences also sparked debate, with some advocating for minimal lighting to preserve the area’s natural aesthetics, while others noted that the Department of Public Works had established standards that would need to be followed or waived.

Public comments highlighted further concerns about the development. Residents questioned the validity of a 2005 subdivision permit, seeking clarity on the legal documentation required to resolve potential issues. The need for a legal yield plan waiver was debated, with the consensus being that it should be avoided if unnecessary. The dialogue underscored the need for transparency and thoroughness in addressing community concerns.