The commission’s decision to repeal the PACE program followed debate about its impact on residents and the city’s role in its oversight. Commissioners expressed frustration over their inability to control or verify the program’s implementation, with one member noting that other elected officials also sought to distance themselves from PACE in its current form. The sentiment was to “wipe the slate clean” and consider new ways to achieve the program’s original goals with better oversight. Despite representations from PACE financing organizations like Y Green Energy Fund and Home Run Financing, who advocated for a review instead of an outright repeal, the motion to deauthorize PACE programs was passed unanimously.

Concerns were raised about the program’s potential to increase property taxes unexpectedly, leading to financial strain on homeowners. The commission acknowledged that while residents could still access PACE financing through Martin County, the city would not be involved in these transactions, highlighting the need for clearer communication and safeguards for residents.

Following the decision on PACE, the commission turned its attention to the possibility of hiring an environmental attorney to focus on the St. Lucie River’s challenges. The idea stemmed from a community member’s call for a full-time environmental attorney to help restore the river, which has suffered from pollution and degradation over the years. The commission considered the job description for this role and discussed whether it should be a dedicated position or part of the existing city attorney’s responsibilities.

The potential for litigation and lobbying strategies was a focal point in the discussion, with some participants advocating for a strong legal stance to address environmental concerns. However, there was caution about the financial implications of hiring additional legal staff and the potential adversarial relationships with federal entities, such as the Army Corps of Engineers. The commission debated the necessity of the role, weighing the benefits of having a dedicated attorney against the costs and potential duplication of efforts already undertaken by other organizations.

Despite differing opinions, there was a consensus on the need for immediate action to address environmental issues, with suggestions to conduct a feasibility study and engage experts for professional insights. The commission emphasized balancing legal representation with maintaining collaborative relationships with community organizations and agencies focused on environmental protection.

In other discussions, the commission recognized long-serving city employees and acknowledged the sanitation department’s efforts in maintaining the city’s cleanliness. A presentation highlighted the department’s initiatives, including electronic waste collection and recycling programs, which aim to promote environmental sustainability through community engagement.

Additionally, the commission addressed the development of a vocational training initiative linked to Project Lyft, aimed at providing job readiness training for young adults in East Stewart. The program, initially intended as a business incubator in collaboration with Indian River State College (IRSC), shifted focus to Project Lyft after IRSC opted out. The initiative received support from commissioners, who saw it as a means to foster economic development in the area through vocational training.