The meeting’s most issue involved Robert and Olga Hamilton, who voiced concerns about their CDBG-funded housing project. Robert Hamilton accused the contractor, Patriot Response Group, of installing oversized windows and failing to replace essential roof features, alleging fraud and improper handling by city officials. He claimed his complaints had been ignored since July 2024, and a fraudulent lien was placed on his property. Olga Hamilton echoed these grievances, questioning the authenticity of documents that bore her name without her consent.

A board member clarified that the city had taken action under Florida Commerce’s directives to address the lien, and the Hamiltons were awarded $667,000 for their project. The board member explained that the contractor claimed the Hamiltons authorized changes, leading to the installation of non-standard windows, a claim the Hamiltons contested. The State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) determined the windows did not meet historical guidelines, prompting the CDBG program to cover costs for hiring a new contractor to correct the issue.

The board member attempted to resolve the Hamiltons’ concerns by affirming that the city followed state directives and that no further board action was needed. However, the Hamiltons felt their grievances were unresolved, highlighting the complexities of the CDBG process and challenges in navigating contractor work within historical preservation constraints.

The discussion drew attention to the administrative costs involved, with some members suggesting the matter be resolved at the City Commission level. A proposal was made to revisit the issue after SHPO concluded its investigation, delaying further decisions to avoid premature actions. The board consensus leaned towards waiting for SHPO’s findings before continuing discussions on the Hamilton project.

Shifting focus, the Stuart CRA approved a budget amendment for the final phase of the Memorial Park revitalization project. The project has evolved over several years, addressing deficiencies such as the lack of pedestrian improvements and restroom facilities. The updated plans include a multifunctional stage area, park benches, a wide entry path, and a ten-foot-wide walkway to facilitate movement during events. Designed with an ADA-compliant ramp and retractable awning, the stage aims to withstand high winds.

The project is primarily funded by ARPA funds, contributing approximately $1.5 million, with an additional $178,000 requested from the CRA. The CRA discussed utilizing remaining municipal impact fees and funds from a half-cent infrastructure sales tax to complete the project. Concerns about the project’s timeline were raised, as a Purchase Order must be issued by December 2024 to avoid forfeiting ARPA funds.

In another significant agenda item, the CRA approved amendments to the Business Improvement Reimbursement Program (BURP), which assists property and business owners with visible exterior improvements. The program, initially offering up to $4,000 in grants, now provides up to $10,000 for enhancements. The CRA manager explained that the program had been revised multiple times since its inception to adapt to changing needs, including compliance with the city’s Land Development Code.

The CRA also introduced a new Commercial Landscape Improvement Reimbursement Grant Program (CLIP), providing up to $5,000 per property for landscape improvements. Aimed at enhancing the visible appearance of commercial properties, the program seeks to rectify aesthetic deficiencies and promote economic vitality. The board expressed enthusiasm for the program, though concerns about maintenance and long-term commitments were raised. A motion to approve the CLIP program passed with a 5-2 vote, reflecting support for the initiative amidst ongoing discussions about funding and development strategies.