The board’s primary focus was on the proposal for the adaptive reuse of the historic building on Springfield Avenue. Representatives from Saxum Real Estate, including Kieran Flanigan, outlined the building’s history and the planned renovations, emphasizing the preservation of its historic character. The site, originally constructed in 1928, is recognized for its architectural and historical significance in the Central Retail Business District. Proposed changes include a third-floor addition, interior renovations, and relocating rooftop mechanical equipment. The board was satisfied with the presentation, expressing no concerns.

The renovations aim to transform the building into a multi-tenant space, with retail on the first floor and offices above. Architect Nancy Daugherty from Studio 1200 confirmed the renovations would adhere to historic preservation guidelines. The majority of the exterior will remain unchanged, with the third floor set back from the street to minimize visual impact. The building’s historical elements, such as the terrazzo flooring and decorative plaster, will be preserved.

Further discussion focused on the building’s gross floor area, set to increase from 14,474 to 16,612 square feet, with the building coverage unchanged at 92.3%. The project remains compliant with local regulations, requiring no variances. The renovation will create a “warm shell,” preparing the space for future tenants, including potential restaurants and retail businesses. The relocation of HVAC equipment to the high roof and the addition of screening to mitigate noise were addressed, with assurances that these changes would not impact neighboring properties.

The Planning Board deliberated on the adaptive reuse aspects, commending the project’s alignment with historic preservation standards. The discussion included potential solar panel installations on the roof, though these were not part of the current plan. Concerns about accessibility were raised, particularly at the Springfield Avenue entrance, which requires modifications for compliance without compromising the building’s integrity.

Public comments highlighted the potential for solar energy solutions as a missed opportunity, given the building’s favorable orientation. The applicant acknowledged the marketing benefits of sustainable energy solutions in attracting tenants.

In addition to the main project, the board discussed amendments to the Downtown Redevelopment and Revitalization Ordinance (DRRO), focusing on rooftop amenity usage. Members debated regulations concerning noise levels and the use of music and televisions. Concerns about potential noise disturbances from rooftop bars were addressed, with discussions on setting noise limits and the implications for surrounding properties. The conversation also touched on the formation of a subcommittee to improve collaboration between the Planning Board and the governing body, highlighting past issues of disconnect.

The board also discussed the state plan awaiting approval, with anticipation for maps indicating changes in planning areas. The importance of these maps for municipal planning was noted as crucial for facilitating county response processes.