One of the primary topics at the meeting was a proposal to renovate a historic home on Oakridge Avenue. The property, a 1930s Georgian Colonial, required extensive updates to maintain its architectural essence while modernizing its infrastructure. The renovation plan included relocating the kitchen, adding a dining room, and creating a family room, all while preserving the home’s original character. The upgrades would also address outdated systems, such as heating, cooling, plumbing, and electrical, in addition to reinforcing the roof and improving energy efficiency. The project necessitated several variances due to the unique topographical challenges, including a steep slope that classified the basement as an additional story, thus exceeding the permitted height limits.

The board’s discussions revealed the complexities of balancing modernization with preservation, particularly in historic neighborhoods. The renovation was designed to respect the architectural style of the original structure, with careful consideration of the floor area ratio and building height. The proposed changes were deemed minimal in terms of neighborhood impact, with assurances that the attic space complied with local and state construction codes. The applicant, supported by an architect and civil engineer, expressed a commitment to maintaining the home’s historical integrity while enhancing its functionality. The board approved the necessary variances, recognizing the project’s alignment with community interests and the applicant’s responsiveness to zoning requirements.

Another item on the agenda was the proposed construction on Springfield Avenue. The development involves demolishing an existing structure to build a new office space that mimics a residential design. The project requires variances due to site conditions, including parking space shortfalls and lot coverage exceedances. The proposal includes 14 parking spaces, incorporating credits for electric vehicle and handicap spaces, although the office’s square footage technically demands 20 spaces. The design aims to maintain a residential appearance, with an ADA ramp and front porch contributing to this aesthetic.

The board examined the stormwater management plan associated with the Springfield Avenue proposal. The plan involves implementing a dry well or pipe system that surpasses city requirements, managing runoff effectively and preventing excess water flow into the city’s drainage system. Landscaping improvements, such as a 5-foot-high planting buffer and screening to block vehicle headlights, were also highlighted. Concerns about existing site features, like a light pole and trash enclosure, were addressed, with plans to retain and upgrade these elements to meet city standards.

Charlie Opler, a co-owner of the property, detailed the necessity of relocating the business due to changes at their current location. Opler emphasized that the new design would support the business’s operational needs while adhering to local zoning guidelines. The board considered the impact of the proposed variances and the necessity of maintaining consistency with the neighborhood’s character. Questions about the existing structure and the proposed changes were raised, with the board acknowledging the need for further meetings to address outstanding concerns and finalize the application process.