The most notable discussion centered around a proposal for a property on Oxbow Lane, where the applicant sought a variance for disturbing approximately 5,100 square feet of steep slopes to construct a patio and two-tier retaining wall. The proposal aimed to enhance the property’s usability by creating functional outdoor areas while addressing drainage through an updated landscape and stormwater management plan. The engineer assured the board that the disturbance would be limited, with no alteration to existing drainage patterns. Compliance with all engineering requirements was promised, including resizing dry wells to accommodate increased impervious coverage and addressing landscaping concerns to screen mechanical units.

Board members deliberated the necessity and practicality of the proposed modifications, acknowledging the property’s constraints due to its steep slopes. Although some members expressed discomfort with the procedural aspects and the addition of patio plans post-initial submission, they recognized the practical need for the modifications.

In another key application, discussions revolved around proposed driveway and garage modifications for a property on Dayton Road. The existing garage’s alignment posed maneuverability challenges, prompting the owners to propose a front-facing garage door and a new driveway layout. This change aimed to facilitate easier access while introducing landscaping to replace existing pavement. The project also involved constructing a three-foot wall and repurposing the remaining brick drive into a patio.

The board scrutinized the application, focusing on the technical specifications such as the driveway’s curb cut width, which exceeded the permitted width and required a variance. Concerns about stormwater management were mitigated by the presence of an existing dry well, deemed adequate to handle the property’s drainage needs. The board concluded that the modifications would enhance the property’s functionality without significant impact on neighbors, leading to a favorable decision.

A separate application for a property on Kent Place Boulevard involved modifications to existing construction plans. The owners faced communication issues with their previous architect, resulting in a new proposal requiring additional variances. The revised plans included maintaining a non-conforming sideyard setback and relocating a generator closer to the property line. The board evaluated the implications of these changes, considering the property’s unique dimensions within the R15 zone. The architect argued that the proposed generator placement was more beneficial given the existing layout and landscaping.

Some board members expressed frustration over the lack of plans, emphasizing the necessity for comprehensive stormwater strategies in light of increased impervious coverage. Despite these concerns, the board demonstrated a willingness to approve applications conditionally, provided that applicants adhered to engineering recommendations and submitted plans for review.