The current garage on Elm Street was described as dilapidated and prone to flooding, posing significant challenges for Coats, who stores a collection of classic vintage cars off-site due to space constraints. The proposed plan includes a new garage measuring 28 feet in depth, which exceeds the permitted dimensions, to include a staircase leading to a storage loft. This design choice is driven by Coats’ health concerns, making a walk-up stair essential. The board heard detailed testimony from Coats’ architect, Elizabeth Rush, and engineer, Andrew Clark, who outlined the technical aspects of the proposal, including the introduction of a dry well and pervious driveway surface to manage stormwater runoff effectively.

The discussion revealed a thoughtful approach to improving the property’s functionality while ensuring compliance with zoning regulations. Clark emphasized that the design would not only address the garage’s existing drainage problems but also enhance stormwater management beyond standard requirements. This measure aims to reduce impervious coverage slightly, thus benefiting the property’s overall sustainability.

Board members raised questions concerning the necessity of a setback variance related to modifications on the existing deck and the proposed garage’s height. Clark acknowledged the deck’s non-conforming status and suggested that a variance might be prudent, while the garage’s height was adjusted to adhere to zoning codes. The board explored the implications of these changes, focusing on ensuring compliance with local ordinances and minimizing potential impacts on neighboring properties.

Simultaneously, the board handled a separate application from the Beacon Unitarian Universalist Congregation, primarily concerning the glare from reflective glass panels in their building design. The architect addressed previous concerns by detailing changes to the glass specifications, including the application of a patterned film to reduce glare and enhance bird safety.

In another segment of the meeting, the board discussed traffic and parking implications for a proposed house of worship on Springfield Avenue. The conversation centered on the site’s parking requirements, particularly the number of spaces needed according to local ordinances. Testimony revealed a discrepancy between the current parking provision and the demand based on seating capacity, with the proposed plan lacking sufficient spaces to meet those needs. The board expressed concerns about the potential impact on local traffic and parking, noting that the site’s parking strategy required further evaluation in light of zoning regulations and community needs.

Concerns were raised about parking on Springfield Avenue during adverse weather conditions and the potential for increased traffic during peak church events.