The shared-use path project, led by engineer and select board member Daniel Murphy, proposes a series of modifications along Route 116 to accommodate the path. Murphy and a representative from VHB, the engineering firm involved, outlined the plans, which include reducing existing shoulder widths and introducing a larger concrete barrier on bridges. The project is divided into segments, with considerations for maintaining existing drainage and adding safety features like signalized crossings. Despite its potential to improve local infrastructure, the project has raised questions about its feasibility and funding.

Concerns about cyclist safety and the path’s practicality were prominent during the meeting. Participants highlighted the need for a bike lane on a particular road section leading to Paul’s Road, emphasizing the danger posed by insufficient shoulder space. The lack of safe alternative routes, such as Route 47, was noted as a issue. Additionally, some attendees questioned the proposed path’s effectiveness, drawing parallels to a seldom-used sidewalk project near Yankee Candle. They emphasized the importance of considering cyclists’ behavior and preferences, especially given the financial investment involved.

The debate extended to the safety of the proposed two-way bike path along one side of Route 116. Some attendees expressed concerns about cyclists facing oncoming traffic, despite assurances that the design adheres to the state’s complete streets policy. Discussions also touched on road conditions, debris accumulation, and snow removal challenges, which could impact the path’s usability. Participants suggested exploring state funding to improve road safety and shoulder space, potentially incorporating bike lanes directly into the road rather than relying solely on a separated path.

Wildlife safety and noise pollution were additional concerns for the community. Attendees highlighted the need for wildlife crossing signage to mitigate roadkill incidents and discussed potential technologies to reduce traffic noise along the path. The conversation also addressed the village center visioning project, with suggestions to slow down traffic through the corridor to enhance safety and reduce noise levels.

The meeting further explored the project’s funding and logistical aspects. Board members emphasized the importance of securing state and federal funds to cover the project’s costs, minimizing the financial burden on the town. The possibility of contributions from the University of Massachusetts was also discussed, given the increased traffic burden on neighboring towns. The project’s timeline for design approval could span five to six years, with sections unfolding over time.

Other items on the agenda included a land acknowledgement resolution, which the board agreed to place on the town’s website to complement existing historical records. The placement was unanimously approved, recognizing its historical relevance. The board also reviewed and signed an attestation for Chief Deatropolis’s police re-certification, confirming compliance with Massachusetts’ three-year certification requirement.