24:44The debate over Superintendent Cittadino’s contract was the most contentious issue of the meeting. Public comments revealed a community split between support for extending his contract and calls for change. One speaker, Ron Varel, a parent and longtime resident, commended Cittadino for his crisis management skills and commitment to students. Another resident, Mar MX, highlighted improved graduation rates under Cittadino’s leadership, arguing that his lack of a doctorate should not overshadow his achievements. MX warned that finding a suitable replacement would be difficult if Cittadino were to leave.

On the other hand, Carolyn Mack, another community member, questioned Cittadino’s failure to obtain an advanced degree, which was reportedly a condition of his employment. She criticized his support for diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives. The divide was further emphasized by a former teacher, Kim Linley, who urged the board to delve deeper into the district’s issues rather than take surface-level observations.

44:02The board deliberated between two contract options for Cittadino: a two-year contract with a 2.5% annual salary increase or a one-year contract with a 6% increase. Some board members favored the two-year option, citing the need for a comprehensive search for a new superintendent, which could take up to a year. They argued that the two-year option was more fiscally responsible and would provide stability during financially challenging times. The decision was scheduled for a future vote.

In addition to the superintendent’s contract, financial challenges facing the district were a concern. A board member expressed frustration over the inability to restore previous levels of busing services, highlighting the district’s ongoing budget constraints.

1:01:34The meeting also touched on various educational initiatives. The Special Education PTA is raising funds for a multi-classroom renovation at the high school to enhance the learning environment for exceptional students. The goal is to raise $20,000 for supplies and materials, with community involvement encouraged through sponsorship opportunities.

Another initiative, the “Lucky Charms” promotion by the Old Bridge Education Foundation, allows parents to recognize teachers through donations. The program had raised approximately $700, with contributions still being accepted.

Amidst the debates, there were positive reports about the district’s inclusivity and educational culture. A recent national site visit involving administrators, teachers, parents, and students yielded positive feedback, with students describing the district as a family where they feel a strong sense of belonging. Students appreciated that teachers took the time to understand them, fostering a supportive atmosphere.

The board also addressed the issue of chronic absenteeism, which had been reduced from 18% to 9% post-COVID. This progress was attributed to federal support initiatives, including attendance liaisons and mental health coordinators, and was recognized by state officials as a notable achievement.

As the meeting concluded, board members acknowledged the complexities of the decisions at hand, emphasizing the importance of community involvement in ongoing budget discussions. Upcoming school productions, including musicals at the high school and two middle schools, were announced, with encouragement for community attendance and support.