The most notable topic of the meeting was the ongoing discussion surrounding the 40B comprehensive special permit for Veterans Crossing. The developer’s senior project manager, Yara Verut, provided an update on the project, highlighting progress made in response to community feedback and town staff recommendations. A primary concern was the driveway’s proximity to Pine Street. Neighbors voiced apprehension about potential traffic impacts, prompting the project team to analyze alternatives and collaborate with town planning staff. Modifications to the parking lot were introduced, including a one-way circulation design to alleviate congestion and prevent on-road parking. However, the community remained skeptical, with residents requesting the driveway be moved to minimize disruption to Pine Street.

In addition to traffic considerations, the meeting delved into landscaping updates. A critical concern was the placement of a culvert along the property line, which connects to another culvert extending through a green space. The project team planned to address potential structural issues from tree root growth by opting for shrubs and grasses over larger trees. Eight new shade trees were slated for planting to enhance the visual buffer between the parcels. However, the arborist’s survey concluded that preserving existing trees risked damaging the culvert, leading to their removal. The project team aimed to mitigate any negative impact on residents by proposing adjustments to the landscaping and lighting designs.

Further, the meeting addressed structural updates to the building, with changes to the porch and entry points to improve aesthetics and safety. A shadow study was presented to assess the building’s impact on neighboring properties, accounting for seasonal variations.

During the public comment segment, residents expressed concerns about parking issues stemming from the project. Steve Gadman from Pine Street highlighted the inconvenience of losing parking near the new driveway, which might force residents to park in front of their homes. He suggested consolidating the entrance and exit to a single point away from residential properties to minimize disruption.

The board also discussed the necessity of a comprehensive peer review process, particularly regarding parking and traffic, as well as civil plans. A proposal was made to engage peer review consultants early to ensure timely progression of the project, emphasizing the limited timeline for public hearings. The board considered authorizing the chair to select a peer review consultant before the next meeting.

Safety concerns were further highlighted as board members questioned the suitability of the proposed driveway location near Pine Street, citing potential queuing issues and the site’s dangerous nature. Additionally, inquiries were made about the noise levels from equipment planned for the building’s roof. The board assured compliance with existing codes.

In a procedural matter, the board proposed a motion to designate a member to oversee the selection of a civil peer review consultant. This motion, which included collaboration with the Department of Public Works and other relevant departments, received unanimous approval.