The board first addressed a variance request for a new covered back porch on Riverside Drive. The applicant sought to replace an outdated structure on their property. Due to the triangular shape of the lot, there were inherent limitations that required the board’s intervention. The staff’s report emphasized that while both the existing and the proposed structures were nonconforming, the new construction would actually present an improvement by reducing the infringement on the property’s setback requirements. The board recognized that the new porch would be less of a deviation from the code than the current structure, leading to their unanimous approval of the variance.

Next on the agenda was a issue concerning the development on East Boyer Street. The request was to waive the standard requirement to construct a sidewalk along the abutting street. The site presented several challenges, including a narrow right-of-way and the potential damage to mature trees, which were identified as obstacles to sidewalk construction. Staff presentations and board discussions revolved around the criteria for granting such a waiver, with particular emphasis on maintaining public access to the nearby Pinellas Trail.

A critical point of the deliberation centered on whether the walkway would encroach on private property and how it would coexist with the natural topography and existing vegetation. The staff concluded that the request met the necessary criteria, particularly in preserving the right-of-way and ensuring public access to the trail. Ultimately, the board concurred with the staff’s assessment and voted to approve the waiver.

Further complicating the matter on East Boyer Street was the involvement of Anclote Distilling, represented by Steve Corrado, who had plans to redevelop the property while preserving its historical significance. The board’s decision to waive the sidewalk requirement was influenced by the consideration to protect two mature live oak trees on the premises. The members of the board expressed their support for the preservation of these trees, recognizing them as valuable assets to the community. They also noted the availability of alternative pedestrian paths, including the Pinellas Trail, which offered a safer route for foot traffic.

The applicant’s emphasis on the historical aspects of the property and their commitment to its redevelopment seemed to resonate well with the board, leading to the approval of the waiver. The board’s decision supported the notion that development can be achieved in harmony with conservation efforts.

The meeting also touched on administrative matters, including a brief discussion about the board’s schedule. It was decided that the board would not convene in August, allowing a recess during the summer months. This decision was made without much fanfare but is significant as it sets the board’s timetable for the remainder of the year.